Patriot Pride
2021
—
Herriman/Online,
UT/US
Speech Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
Erin Akins
Corner Canyon High School
None
Sheree Allison
Granger High Debate
None
Mariah Andreasen
Bingham High School
None
Alex Bailey
North Sanpete High School
None
Michel Bohn
Corner Canyon High School
None
Christian Bradley
Cottonwood High
None
stephanie campbell
Providence Hall High School
None
jordan case
Cottonwood High
8 rounds
None
Tiffany Chan
Providence Hall High School
Last changed on
Sat December 10, 2022 at 10:23 AM MDT
- Did Lincoln-Douglas debate (2nd in State) and extemporaneous speaking(Nationals qualifier) all of high school
- Former national competitor in University of Utah's John R. Park Debate Society
- qualified for National Forensics Association nationals
Debates:
- Good with any speed; don't slur or I'll stop flowing.
- I won't flow cross-examination, but I do encourage that you refer back to cross-ex specifically if needed
- Signpost!!!
- Traditional and progressive are good with me
- Impact scenarios are good
IEs:
- Varsity Extemp: have at least 7-8 sources
- Novice Extemp: have at least 5-6 sources
Larissa Cherpeski
Providence Hall High School
None
Eleisha Clayton
Taylorsville High School
None
Melissa Cosgrove
Granger High Debate
None
Naomoi Craner
West Jordan High School
Last changed on
Mon October 11, 2021 at 9:52 AM MDT
Email: naomicraner82@gmail.com
About me: Political science major philosophy/gender studies minor at the University of Utah. I am highly experienced in policy and PF, mainly UT circuit and some nat. I’m familiar with LD and have done some coaching there, and have a long background with Model UN so I’m familiar with congress as well. I have some speech experience, mainly in impromptu.
Debate: I flow every argument, but if it comes down to it I will vote on technicalities. While I am personally a leftist, if the more conservative arguments are presented well I will vote for them. I love sass, theory, and hearing things beyond what’s in the briefs. I can tell when you actually understand what you’re saying vs when you just found it on debate.cards, so don’t bullsh*t me. I’m a bit of a philosophy nerd so use those points to your advantage. AFF: always have a clear advocacy. NEG: an alt will help, but isn’t necessary. I will make sure I’m somewhat familiar with the topic before judging, and this includes examining the natural bias of the topic so I can vote more fairly. Don’t go over time or stall the round for any reason that isn’t absolutely necessary..
Speech: I will vote for the most clear, organized, and engaging speaker. Subject matter is less important than presentation, but it should make sense. In improvised speeches, don’t repeat yourself if you have nothing else to say. A slightly convoluted analysis will get you much further than redundancy. Also—I will rank you lower if you lack etiquette towards other competitors throughout the round.
To everyone: Be yourself, but don’t be rude. I think debate teaches important life skills, but the culture can be toxic, so make sure you’re not contributing to that aspect. Passion is a wonderful thing in this space, but never at the expense of others’ well being.
Quinn Curtis
Cottonwood High
8 rounds
None
Kyle Daniels
Cyprus High School
8 rounds
None
Chris Davies
Alta High School
Last changed on
Thu February 22, 2024 at 6:50 AM MDT
Hello,
I'm an attorney and I was admitted to the Utah Bar in 1997. I work in the medical device and pharmaceutical industries.
Please present your issues clearly, concisely, respectfully and debate zealously. However, I am not a fan of Ks, spreading and/or spewing (unless spreading is expected or allowed) or asking for disqualifications for minor infractions and doing so will lead me to believe you are not well prepared and reaching for any object or argument just to keep your head above water.
Good luck and have fun!
Chris
Nathan Farrer
Tooele High School
None
Susan Fisher
Bingham High School
None
Mike Foutz
Cyprus High School
None
Ashton Gardner
Salem Hills High School
Last changed on
Thu January 18, 2024 at 5:39 PM MDT
Under personal review please ask before round for paradigm.
Congress Paradigm:
Debate Paradigm:
Speech Paradigm:
Diane Gilmore
Taylorsville High School
None
Stephanie Harding
Taylorsville High School
Last changed on
Mon June 17, 2024 at 12:57 AM MDT
Hello, debaters! I’m so glad to be here with you. I participated in speech and debate in high school and competed in LD debate and a little bit of CX. But, that was a while ago. I love clear, logical arguments backed up by credible sources as well as good questioning for better understanding of your competitors. I will flow the rounds, but I know I am not as fast as you would like me to be! I will do my best. Good luck!
Emily Heinhold
Bingham High School
None
Madilynn Hollaway
Tooele High School
8 rounds
None
Ruby Johnson
American Preparatory
8 rounds
None
Dani Jones
Tooele High School
8 rounds
None
Steven Larsen
Maple Mountain High School
None
Jared Lassche
Cyprus High School
None
Tanner Latham
American Preparatory
Last changed on
Thu January 4, 2024 at 3:39 AM MDT
I'm a traditional judge. Overall, I look for professionalism and that as you debate you defend your case while working to defeat your opponents' case. If an opponent offers arguments/counter-arguments/evidence, you need to recognize and address it. Don't just ignore it or act as if it doesn't affect your case, otherwise it might end up doing just that.
LD: I want to see how your arguments tie into your Value and Value Criterion. Also make sure you're explaining why your Value should be the held above others in the round.
If you choose to use plans/counterplans, both parties need to accept them in the round, otherwise you'll have to argue as to whether it fits under the resolution.
Make sure your points are logical, tie into your evidence or value, and can show a clear path to the argument you're making.
PF: Make sure your arguments are logical. If you have a Framework, make sure your points tie to the Framework and that the philosophy strengthens your side of the resolution. If there is a contest of evidence, I may ask to view it.
Kathleen Matthes
Intermountain Christian School
None
Craig McOmie
Summit Academy High School
Last changed on
Sat December 11, 2021 at 12:49 AM MDT
I am a big fan of rhetoric. I believe and vote primarily off strong links and proofs. If you’re going to make a claim make sure it has a good foundation and connects to the rest of your arguments. I don't care how pretty or cohesive an argument is if it's only tangentially related to the topic being discussed.
I’m fine with spreading as long as it’s understandable.
I don't mind theory or Ks, but if you decide to run one make sure you can justify it. Above all I care about the merit of your argument and the impact of what you're saying.
John Medley
Tooele High School
8 rounds
None
Christopher Montoya
Juab High School
None
Megan Montoya
Juab High School
None
Paul Mooney
Summit Academy High School
None
Spencer Moore
Providence Hall High School
None
Sara Ochs-Howser
American Preparatory
None
wendy parikh
Cyprus High School
None
Dario Perez
Cottonwood High
None
Scott Pettit
Summit Academy High School
8 rounds
Last changed on
Mon January 8, 2024 at 3:58 AM MDT
I've been a debate coach for many years and have a good understanding of how each event should be done.
I believe that a good debate is one that focuses on the intention of the resolution. I'm not a big fan of definition-based debates that try to win based on how one team interprets the resolution over another.
Evidence is also key. All evidence should be properly cited and relevant. It should also be presented in a way that maintains the original positions of the author(s).
Respect is key. Debate is a civil event. There is never a need to shout or use foul language. You should treat your opponent with respect and remember that we can only hold debates if there are individuals willing to do the activity. Speaking poorly about someone, either in round or outside of a round is uncalled for.
In speech events, I respect originality. I'm not too much of a fan of speaking given solely to create shock and discomfort. I believe that serious issues can be discussed without having to focus on how negative everything is.
Marcia Probstel
Tooele High School
None
Robert Purvis
Tooele High School
None
Mitzi Reynolds
Tooele High School
None
Debbie Richards
Cottonwood High
None
Tanya Roundy
Westlake High School
8 rounds
Last changed on
Tue January 9, 2024 at 6:46 AM MDT
I am a coach of over 15 years for policy, pf, ld and all speech events at North Sanpete HS, Mission San Jose, Alta and Summit Academy, at Westlake High School and currently an Assistant Coach for Salem Hills High School.
In HS I competed in Speech events, LD and coached policy teams (there was no pf then).
I am the Chair for the NSDA Sundance District and former president for the UDCA. I have judged IE and debate events at the Nationals Level and have served on the pf wording committee. In other words, I know what I'm doing and know speech and debate very well!
I believe that you should give a well organized logical argument in any debate or speech. Topicality is imperative to a debate, and supporting and explaining your position on that topic is vital to a clear argument construct. If you don't say it, I didn't hear it. Don't assume I will know what your evidence means the same as you...
Policy debate should be relevant, and well understood by the competitors otherwise it will not be understood by the judges. I do not mind speed, but if it is so fast that I can no longer understand your words, then I can no longer understand your argument to judge it. K's and theory are fine as long as they go toward the overall value of the debate and topic. They should in no way demonize or devalue any individual or group of people asa part of the K. Analysis and connection of evidence/cards to the plan and solvency is imperative in making a good argument and being a good debater. Cards do not a case make, the debater does. Know your cards, know your plan, and know how they work to support and solve the inherency of the issues involved.
Public Forum should be a thoughtful discussion and not overly repeat questions and answers. Don't just read evidence and think it will make your argument for you. PF IS NOT just policy light....it is its own event with no plans and merits. Treat it well. Weighing and analysis of the topic, evidence, and oppositions arguments are imperative.
Lincoln Douglas should have a clear value and criterion from which to work from, and stay focused on topic and argument. Don't just read evidence and think it will make your argument for you. CARDS and EVIDENCE DO NOT A CASE MAKE...the debater does. Analysis, rebuttal, and connections to the value criterion are paramount in an LD round Plans are ok, as long as they are relevant, on topic, and are shown how they connect to the value criterion like any other argument in the case.
IEs should be unique, appropriate, and follow all structures outlined in their respective events. I look for organization, relevance, creativity and thoughtfulness as well as the presentation being engaging, and suitable for piece and audience. Remember when trying to engage an audience, one should want to help them understand, be brought into the conversation, and allowed to learn another perspective while still maintaining their own in the end. Try not to preach, demean, or ostracize your judge in your piece or presentation---even when controversial topic---they can be great, if done right.
Sydnie Schoepf
Alta High School
8 rounds
Last changed on
Wed October 28, 2020 at 4:24 AM MDT
I look for quality evidence that's well articulated and individuals/teams that have solid follow-through after constructive(s) to not only attack the contentions of their opponent(s) but to resubstantiate/resupport their own points in response to their opponent's attacks or what their opponent has dropped. Pre-crafted arguments about what your opponent has said or dropped that are obviously pre-crafted because they're inaccurate for the round will hurt your overall score -- it demonstrates a lack of listening and adaptation.
I want good offense and defense without lacking professionalism. Ad Hominem attacks will work against you.
Rebecca Schumacher
Intermountain Christian School
None
Joshua Scribner
Timpanogos
None
Stephan Seabury
Providence Hall High School
None
Orion Sheen
Cyprus High School
None
Madison Simpson
Maple Mountain High School
None
Jonathan Spencer
Corner Canyon High School
Last changed on
Tue January 2, 2024 at 10:53 AM MST
My name is Jonathan Spencer. I would like to applaud you first and foremost for dedicating the time to such a useful and enriching activity. I am a proud member of generation X and don't believe in voting straight ticket in any election. I have a graduate degree from Westminster College of Utah and I work in the financial services sector. Some of the items I will be looking for when I am evaluating your round or event:
1-Preparation. Chance favors those who have spend the time to prepare and put in the hard work to have a successful round.
2-Passion. I want to be moved to feel why your point of view is relevant and valid even if I may disagree with you.
3-Decorum. Its important people are treated with respect and show validation even when a point of view is not in alignment with your own perspective.
4-Be concise. I am not counting words & I'm not overly sensitive to the time you use (however some judges may be).
5- Politics. It is not important to me what political slant you bring into your topic. As stated earlier I want to sense your passion and energy from your presentation. My assessment of you is not swayed by your political views and this does not factor into my evaluation. However I am very interested to learn & become informed from your perspective. Please do not alter your words or content by compromising yourself on the grounds of trying to pick up points by appealing to what political lenses you believe I want to hear.
I'm looking forward to hearing what you have worked so hard to prepare and eager to be a part of your adventure in your next round.
JS
Angalee Starshadow
Cyprus High School
None
Mary Stratford
Taylorsville High School
Last changed on
Sat January 21, 2023 at 11:09 AM MDT
I am a high school English teacher and know how to write effective essays and speeches. I do not, however, have formal debate training. As a high school English teacher, I value the writing of the speech itself. As a debater, you should go into each round assuming that I know nothing about the topic at hand. Give definitions, explain concepts, speak clearly and explicitly. You can’t convince me to choose your side if I don’t understand your side. Please teach me before you convince me. If you choose to speak quickly, be warned that you need to still speak clearly. If I cannot hear you I cannot judge you.
I typically choose debate winners based on the success of their claims, including those made in crossfire, as they are presented with rhetorical strength, including effectiveness of logos, ethos, and pathos.
John Talbot
Cottonwood High
None
Naalani Tsosie
Cottonwood High
8 rounds
None
Doug Welton
Salem Hills High School
8 rounds
Last changed on
Mon January 8, 2024 at 6:47 AM MDT
I have judged Policy yearly for the past 15 years. I prefer LD and PF, but I am familiar with the ins and outs, but I don't know them intuitively as I have never competed in Policy. I am willing to try and follow whatever you present. However, I expect you to communicate with me. I am the judge, not your opponent. What that means is this, you need to tell me what you are doing and why. Slow down and communicate with me. When I say slow down, what I mean is this:
1. I don't follow speed. I try, but I won't get most of what you say if you are going a million miles an hour. However, I understand the strategy and need. If you spread, you need to slow down and tell why I should care about what you just said. Give me a quick, slowed down summary of what you said, and why I should care.
2. Make taglines very clear! Don't assume I heard your 'next DA' when you're going a million miles an hour. If you want it on my flow, make it clear what it is and where to put it. Spread the rest, but slow down for taglines and summarize what you just said! This is especially important for the 1AC and 1NC.
3. Email chains are helpful, but not. It is nice to have an email chain, but if I have to read the email to understand what you are saying, why give speeches? Also, trying to follow evidence because I can't understand you makes it difficult for me as a judge. I will refer to reference, but will not pour over it after a round to determine a winner. Doing that means I don't need to hear from you. I could sit at home and read your evidence to determine a winner. Don't rely on chains.
Lincoln Douglas
I prefer traditional LD Debate with a Value/Criterion. I have voted for flex-negs, and other more progressive type arguments, but I prefer debates that use Value/Criterion. Don't spread! If you spread in LD, I won't flow. You can go at a crisp pace. In fact, I prefer a crisp paces, but...spread and you will most likely lose.
Katie Wilkinson
Alta High School
8 rounds
Last changed on
Fri February 9, 2024 at 8:34 AM MDT
Debate: Debate is about clash. That being said, if you decide to run a "K" and it does not logically fit with the topic, or opponents spend the debate arguing topicality rather than the topic, this could cost points/ranking. Contentions, frameworks, plans, etc. need to be clear. Roadmaps are helpful, but not required. Be ready to show evidence and have logical connections to your contentions, reasoning.
If you are speaking too quickly for me to understand, I will give you a signal. If you continue to go too fast for me to understand, and not seem to acknowledge my signal, this will impact your scoring.
Congress: I am looking for a well-presented argument on the bill presented. Memorization is good, but not key. However, you should not be reading directly from your speech, especially further into the debate season. Evidence and logic are preferred in your speech, with references to your sources. My scoring is based on how many quality speeches are given, how many quality questions you as between speeches, and how knowledgeable you are about the topic you are presenting. Being a quality chair who is able to control the house/senate is key as well.
Speech: I am looking for a good speaker, someone I would enjoy listening to, and watching all day. Speakers should have clear voice, appropriate tone, and gestures, as well as props appropriate to topic (as event permits). Speeches should also have clear organization which matches topic and tone. Appropriate presentation and dress are a must.
In all events, be respectful and polite. Attack your opponents case, not your opponent, and always leave, if not as friends, at least acquaintances.
Jana Woodbury
Corner Canyon High School
None
Daryl Workman
Salem Hills High School
Last changed on
Fri January 5, 2024 at 5:47 AM MDT
Experience:
Speech and Debate Coach, 8 years
Teacher: History, Language Arts, Civics, and Constitution
Judged PF, LD, Policy, Congress, BQ, and most IE events.
Style:
Cases based solely on theory are often very flimsy but are not altogether invalid. If an opponent is running theory alone, that does not promise a win. You should adequately address their arguments as well as supporting your own topicality.
Spreading anywhere outside of policy debate seems inappropriate most of the time. In policy rounds it should be tempered. If it is in your case but not in your speech, you might not be able to use it and it may be difficult for your opponent to use it against you, but they won't have to.
Novel arguments that are well tied to topicality are always enjoyed, but don't promise a win.
Flow:
Most of my flow is primary contentions and how well they are supported vs attacked. Not significant detail but I can follow cards just fine. Contradictory cards from opponents are just as valid unless you can prove otherwise.
Presentation skill:
Unless something stands out as amazing: Logos>Ethos>Pathos>eye contact
Debate events aren't memorized speeches. If you want me to look up and make eye contact so you can guess what I am thinking, you will get less notes in the process and neither of us will enjoy the round nor the results.
Speech events of any kind maintain the opposite expectation. They should be memorized and make connections. Interps don't require eye contact but you get to decide the value of the 4th wall.
Flagrant violations will always negate your efforts.
Ad Hominem attacks against an opponent will be disciplined in your scores. If they are minimal, you might be warned. If they are excessive or major, they will be addressed through your coach, the tournament director, and possibly your admin or the NSDA.
Calling your opponent stupid in round or after the round in ear shot of the judge is a great way to forfeit a well won round.
I respect your coach and the tournament director but I am not afraid to debate with them either.