Debate has defined parameters that should be followed closely, with that said, I would like to see debaters follow time constraints as well as to be mindful of abuse. Impact calculations play a big role in the sway of my ballot. I do not like CPs or Ks unless the Negative can continue the flow to provide CLASH to the Affirmative. Be witty, be resourceful, be respectful, have fun, and glean knowledge for your next round!

Speeches should feel natural. I find myself ranking higher ballots towards those who engulf and invite me into their world, rendering my pen to ballot useless, as I listen instead of write. Call my attention. Make me laugh. Make me cry. Make me angry. Make me empathetic to your cause.

Effective communication which shows in a student's manner, preparation, performance, and substance. In debate events, it is important to offer evidentiary analysis and specific clash with either policy issues (CD/CX) or values/criterion (LD) without games. Pretty basic.

I really like policy. Common sense policy. Counterplans are great if you can sell it to me with the skills mentioned above.

Kritiks, no. Conditional arguments only if you are clear where you are going with it. I just don't exist in a world where we debate with those strategies. Does not mean I will vote against you, but I just may not understand where you are going with them. Be clear and persuasive, and I'll be more inclined to give you the ballot. Please don't be jerks in the round--I do like some decorum. Not asking you to be phony nice. Win the round with your policy and your ability to communicate that to me.

For larger school circuits whose debate style includes speed/spreading, I will adapt but not a fan. This is TFA and not UIL, so I respect what you are accustomed to on this circuit. I would ask the same courtesy of your coaches if they were judging UIL.

Jack Black rules. Be like Jack.