Delta College High School Speech Debate Invitational
2024 — Stockton, CA/US
Speeh & Debate Judge Paradigm List
All Paradigms: Show HideCompetitive Experience
High School - CHSSA/NSDA - Extemp, OA, PuFo, LD
Collegiate - NFA - Policy/CX
Coaching Experience
High School - CHSSA/NSDA - Assistant (Alumni) Coach; Head Coach/Program Coordinator
Judging Experience
High School - CHSSA/NSDA - All events
Collegiate - NFA - Policy/CX
Background
I have been involved in speech & debate in some capacity since high school and competed at the collegiate level. My emphasis has namely been geared towards extemporaneous speaking and debate (namely PuFo, LD, and Policy/CX). Though I'm new to coaching, I've been in this community of wall takers for over 10 years and love every minute of it!
In terms of my general judging philosophy I'd say two phrases should be considered, those being "tabula rasa" (clean slate) and "sell me!". My perspective is that it's the competitors burden to prove to the judge or show why their performance is equipped to pick up the ballot. Certainly I can make the connection and piece together the narrative/story, but the more you ask me to intervene the more I have to implement my biases into the round. Long-story short it's disheartening to see competitors lose rounds because they leave ambiguity to be pieced together, and as a former competitor who has lost more than one round to this - I don't want to do the same to other speakers/debaters.
In general, from a technique standpoint if you act as though your judges are lay judges it's easier to ramp up than it is to tone back.
Debate Cues
1) Procedures - Card quals, roadmapping, and signposting
These make for a smooth round and much more efficient! Do your judge a favor and get things moving the longer the day, the less quality the adjudication- we get tired too haha
2) Arguments - Impact Calculus, Topicality, and Solvency
I generally am pretty open to what is brought forth, hence my "tabula rasa" spiel, but need to see a clear end result from either team in the debate. Whoever has the more believable and impact narrative will pick up the ballot.
3) Evidence - Needs to be there, this is debate...
No matter the style of debate, if you make an argument it needs to be proven in some way. If not then you ask me to be an "activist judge" where bias takes precedence over argumentation, in my view this is unfair to the competitors and bad for debate.
4) Sportsmanship - We all want to learn from this experience
Compete with honest intent and assertion, but not to cause harm. Too many a time debates get ugly and personal, that's not why we're here. This is a learning opportunity and academically stimulating. Let's keep it civil and competitive.
Speech Cues
1) Structure - Clear and concise
My coach taught me this rule and it's what I teach unto others: a) Tell them what you're gonna tell them; b) Tell them; c) Tell them what you told them. There should be a logical pattern in your speech.
2) Impact - Make it personable
Cultural competency is a really big aspect of public speaking that goes unsung. Find someway to connect with your audience and give us something tangible to take away from the speech, once completed.
3) Creativity - Bring it to life
I have a really special place for Interps and OPP because it brings forth the creative energy and so too can other speeches. Make this speech an experience for us to enjoy!
4) Authentic - You are the centerpiece
With speaking you are the epicenter, give the audience a reason to divert their attention to you! Also, bring some creativity to the forefront this makes for a more compelling speech.