National Speech and Debate Tournament

2024 — Des Moines, IA/US

Holden Ruch Paradigm

Lincoln-Douglas
Lincoln Douglas Debate Judge Philosophy

Your experience with LD Debate (check all that apply)

Current LD coach
Former LD competitor
Experienced LD judge

How many years have you judged LD debate?

8

How many LD rounds have you judged this year?

21-30

What is your preferred rate of delivery?

6/91 = Slow conversational style
9 = Rapid conversation speed
 

Does the rate of delivery weigh heavily in your decision?

Y
 

Will you vote against a student solely for exceeding your preferred speed?

Y

How important is the criterion in making your decision?

It is a major factor in my evaluation
 

Do you feel that a value and criterion are required elements of a case?

Y

Rebuttals and Crystallization

 

Voting issues should be given:

Either is acceptable
 

The use of jargon or technical language ("extend", "cross-apply", "turn", etc.) during rebuttals:

Is acceptable
 

Final rebuttals should include:

Both
 

Voting issues are:

Not necessary

How do you decide the winner of the round?

I decide who is the winner of the key argument in the round

How necessary do you feel the use of evidence (both analytical and empirical) is in the round?

9/91 = Not necessary
9 = Always necessary

Please describe your personal note-taking during the round

I keep a rigorous flow
Additional remarks:

Things I don't like in LD:
- Casework that amounts to a list of reasons to vote aff/neg. Write cases, not lists.
- Spreading if your opponent is not from a circuit where spreading is common. I can handle speed - can your opponent?
- Minimizing the importance of framework. Framework is what sets LD apart.
- A lack of style/flair/entertainment (If I'm going to be judging for 9 hours of my day, entertain me)
- Bad theory that you read every single round no matter the topic (time skew, weaponizing legitimate social causes to win debate rounds w/o a serious violation by your opponent, etc)
- Counterplans. I'm a firm believer that plans are inherently abusive. 

Things I like in LD:
- Coherent casework built around a central guiding principle
- Rebuttal that goes right down the flow - be linear.
- An approach to LD that feels like it's in the spirit of the event - don't gamify the round.

Note: if you wish for your pronouns to appear the debaters you judge on text/email blasts, log into Tabroom, click Profile at top, and add them in the Pronouns field.