National Speech and Debate Tournament

2024 — Des Moines, IA/US

Julius Hodges Paradigm

Lincoln-Douglas
Lincoln Douglas Debate Judge Philosophy

Your experience with LD Debate (check all that apply)

Community judge

How many years have you judged LD debate?

1

How many LD rounds have you judged this year?

0-10

What is your preferred rate of delivery?

4/91 = Slow conversational style
9 = Rapid conversation speed
 

Does the rate of delivery weigh heavily in your decision?

Y
 

Will you vote against a student solely for exceeding your preferred speed?

N

How important is the criterion in making your decision?

It is a major factor in my evaluation
 

Do you feel that a value and criterion are required elements of a case?

Y

Rebuttals and Crystallization

 

Voting issues should be given:

Either is acceptable
 

The use of jargon or technical language ("extend", "cross-apply", "turn", etc.) during rebuttals:

Is acceptable
 

Final rebuttals should include:

Both
 

Voting issues are:

Absolutely necessary

How do you decide the winner of the round?

I decide who is the person who persuaded me more of their position

How necessary do you feel the use of evidence (both analytical and empirical) is in the round?

6/91 = Not necessary
9 = Always necessary

Please describe your personal note-taking during the round

I write down the key arguments throughout the round
Additional remarks:

I always make sure to be honest and up front with students and pick out parts of their performances that didn't help with the overall coherence of the piece. When it comes to dramatic pieces I put a heavy emphasis on characterization as well as speaking quality, for example if a character feels flat or low energy and the interpretation of the character was not meant to be so, I will try to pick that out and give recommendations as to how they could fix that. I also focus on whether the words being said are clear and concise to follow, urging students to enunciate as well make sure that if they are going to do different voices and accents to not let that take away from what they are saying, I'd rather understand a piece than sit there guessing what is being said. For speeches such as INF I judge based off the overall preparedness of the student as well as the speaking tone and volume of the student. I make sure that if the organization, I give recommendations on how to better organize a speech so that if has a bit more flow. As for speaking, I try to look out for clear and confident tone, making sure to avoid awkward silence as well as not sounding unsure in there speaking. I also focus on volume so that the student is able to understand whether they were too quiet or so loud that it felt like I was being screamed at rather than being presented to.

Note: if you wish for your pronouns to appear the debaters you judge on text/email blasts, log into Tabroom, click Profile at top, and add them in the Pronouns field.