I've been coaching and judging for 15+ years. So there isn't much I haven't seen or heard. I'm most persuaded by good debating. Please do not be rude or condescending. Please be clear enough to understand. Use your evidence wisely and whereas big impacts are good, realistic impacts are better. The point of debate, for me, is education and communication. Show me you learned something and that you can communicate in an intelligent, well thought out, cohesive manner. People can write out a hundred paragraphs about what they want but at the end of the day I've coached enough champions to tell you that's what it all boils down to. Most importantly, have fun! Love to see students progress and become the natural born leaders we know you all are! And to give some unsolicited advice from a seasoned coach, don't give up. It's may be cliche but somethings are said over and over for a reason. Keep trying, be consistent and you'll be successful! Good luck everyone!

I am a seasoned debate coach with 14 years of experience, having competed both in high school and college. My judging philosophy is rooted in the belief that debate is a valuable educational activity that teaches critical thinking, effective communication, and advocacy skills. I appreciate and prioritize well-researched arguments, sound logical reasoning, and persuasive speaking techniques. My judging style is fair, respectful, and focused on evaluating the round based on the merits of the arguments presented.

Values and Criteria:

1. Clarity and Communication: I value clear and effective communication. Debaters should strive for clarity in their speech and organization, ensuring that their arguments are easily understood by all participants, including me as the judge.

2. Research and Evidence: Well-researched arguments supported by credible evidence are essential. I appreciate debaters who delve into deep research to support their claims. Quality evidence strengthens the persuasiveness of your arguments.

3. Critical Thinking: I prioritize critical thinking and expect debaters to analyze and engage with the arguments presented. Thoughtful analysis, rather than mere assertion, demonstrates a deep understanding of the topic and enhances the overall quality of the debate.

4. Respect and Sportsmanship: Respect for opponents, fellow debaters, and the activity itself is crucial. I expect all participants to maintain a high level of sportsmanship throughout the round. Respectful cross-examination and rebuttals are appreciated.

5. Adaptability: Debaters should be adaptable and able to respond effectively to different arguments and debate styles. Flexibility in strategy and the ability to adjust to the round's dynamics are valuable skills.

Philosophy: I believe that debate is not just about winning arguments but also about personal growth and learning. While I acknowledge the competitive aspect of the debate, I encourage debaters to view each round as an opportunity to enhance their skills, regardless of the outcome. I appreciate creativity and innovation in argumentation and encourage debaters to think outside the box.

I adhere to the principle of fairness and will evaluate the round impartially. I am open to various debate formats and styles, and I will adapt my judging approach accordingly. My decision will be based on the strength of the arguments presented, the quality of evidence, and the overall persuasive abilities of the debaters.

Analysis and Sound Argumentative Techniques: I place a strong emphasis on the quality of analysis and argumentation. Debaters should focus on developing coherent and logical arguments. Here are some additional points regarding analysis and argumentative techniques:

1. Impactful Arguments: I appreciate arguments that are not only logically sound but also have a clear impact on the round. Debaters should explain the implications of their arguments and why they matter in the context of the debate.

2. Comparative Analysis: Comparative analysis is key to winning debates. Debaters should compare and contrast their arguments with those of their opponents, highlighting the differences and explaining why their arguments are superior.

3. Framework and Criterion: Debaters should establish a clear framework for the round and a criterion for evaluating the arguments. A well-defined framework provides a lens through which I can assess the debate's key issues.

4. Organization: Structured speeches enhance the clarity of arguments. Debaters should organize their speeches coherently, with clear signposting and a logical flow of ideas.

5. Rebuttal Skills: Effective rebuttals are essential. Debaters should address key arguments made by their opponents, pointing out flaws in reasoning and presenting counterarguments. Impactful refutation can significantly influence my decision.

I approach each round with an open mind, valuing clear communication, rigorous analysis, and respectful engagement. I encourage debaters to present their best arguments, supported by thorough research and critical thinking. Remember, debate is not only a competition but also a valuable learning experience, and I look forward to a constructive and enlightening debate round.

I am an experienced judge. I am happy to evaluate any arguments you want to run. I have been judging for 10+ years. I don't have any preferences and am excited to see you all approach the round you want to.