My paradigm is geared toward an educational audience. I was a policy debater in high school in Kansas City and also debated at Missouri State in the late 90s.

I appreciate clash - I expect the speeches to build during the constructive speeches and for you to not only present your arguments but also address the arguments of your opponent.

Cross Examination is important and a way for you to further your position. Please use all your CX time.

Rebuttles should focus on why your arguments should result in a win for your side and why a vote for your side is better than a vote for your opponent's arguments.

Please use evidence for your arguments.

I am open to any arguments you want to run, e.g., topicality, inherency, solvency, counterplans, disadvantages, and Kritiks.

I am a flow judge and appreciate it if you give a flow roadmap.