I am a flow judge. I have been debating for 4 years, 3 of them in PF. I like weighing impacts and comparing worlds. Please be organized and I love off-time roadmaps.

Lay Judge

* Speak slowly and clearly. Keep things simple and logical. Don't use debate jargon.

* When you read evidence, please say reasons behind it also (don't just say we have _ card and move on).

* I prefer reason over evidence. I like when teams remind me of their final case arguments but don't spend a whole minute on it - just say it in one or two sentences.

* If you collapse, please say clearly that you are collapsing.

* I don't believe improbable arguments like nuclear war and extinction. A piece of advice is to run smaller impacts for me to believe and vote for it.

* Please be respectful to each other

Thx and have fun.

I have 4 years of experience debating public forum.

• To an extent, tech>truth (don't try to make up something clearly false.)
• Please don't read anything over 250 words/minute, it gets annoying to flow.
• Please send a speech doc if you read anything over 220 words/minute.
• There needs to be front lining in the second rebuttal
• No new responses or offense in the back half (summary and ff), only weighing can be new here.
• BE RESPECTFUL IN CROSS and the entire round.
• Prog (Theory and Ks) it's ok if you run this, but I'm not incredibly experienced with it.
• Concessions---->dropped (YOU MUST EXTEND if you want me to vote on it)
• No "tricks" please.

The order I look at on my flow:

1. Prog
2. Framing
3. Weighing
4. Offense and defense: If the team that wins the weighing wins their case, then they win the round. If the team that wins the weighing loses their case, then their opponents will win if they win their case. If the opponents don't win the weighing or the case and a team loses their case but wins the weighing, the team that wins the weighing wins.
6. - I also drop teams if there is too much discrimination or disrespect.

Hi debaters,

My paradigm is to be nice and to speak clearly and slowly. I don't like seeing kids argue and fight so please use kind words while debating! Also, speak clearly, loudly, and slowly, so that I can hear you properly.

Thank You!

Lay judge, have judged many rounds. Speak at reasonable pace ie not too fast, please be clear on our main points and impact weighing.

In my opinion, good debaters can articulate their points, have good eye contact, appear confident, show respect to opponents and judges, and present strong evidences.

Dear debaters,

Welcome to this debate round! As the judge, my role is to evaluate the arguments presented by both teams and determine the winner based on the quality of those arguments. Here are some key points that will guide my evaluation:

1. Clarity and Communication:

• Clear articulation and effective communication of ideas are crucial. Make sure your arguments are easy to follow and understand.

2. Content and Substance:

• Focus on providing strong, well-researched content. Cite sources where necessary to support your claims.

3. Relevance and Significance:

• Arguments should be directly relevant to the resolution and should contribute significantly to the debate.

4. Logic and Reasoning:

• Your arguments should be logically sound. Avoid fallacious reasoning and ensure your points are well-structured.

5. Clash and Refutation:

• Engage with your opponents' arguments. Address their points directly and provide strong counterarguments.

6. Fairness and Sportsmanship:

• Treat your opponents with respect and maintain a courteous tone throughout the debate. Avoid personal attacks.

7. Time Management:

• Keep track of your speaking time and use it wisely. Be sure to allocate time for crossfire and rebuttals.

8. Adaptability:

• Be prepared to adjust your arguments based on how the debate unfolds. Flexibility can be a powerful asset.

9. Impact and Weighing:

• Explain the broader implications of your arguments and how they relate to the overall resolution.

10. Final Focus:

• In your final speech, crystallize the key issues of the round and explain why they lead to your team winning.

Remember, the goal of this debate is to engage in a constructive and informative exchange of ideas. Best of luck to both teams, and let's have a great debate!

I've been teaching Civics Advanced Level for 13 years with simulations in Congress, Mock Trials, and Mock Elections. I was on the Board of FHSMUN and Director of Security Council for many years in Model United Nations conferences. My undergrad degrees are in Anthropology with emphasis on Native American Studies and English with a Minor in Japanese Culture and Language. My graduate degree is in Educational Leadership. My knowledge of international and national politics is high. I do not sway politically one way or the other. I am impressed by arguments that show in depth knowledge of a topic backed with data and research from reliable sources. I appreciate students who cite the credibility of sources in their speeches.

I use the word "Clear" if you speak too fast.

I teach classes of Speech and Debate at my school. I have coached and judged students in these events: Congress, Public Forum, Lincoln Douglas, Pro-Con Challenge Debate, Extemporaneous Debate and Speech, Impromptu, Original Oratory, Informative, Declamation, Just Talk Events, Dramatic and Humorous Interp, Duo Interp, Oral Interp of Literature (Poetry and Prose), and Program Oral Interpretation.

I'm a relatively new judge for middle school novice. I appreciate teams who clearly identify their contentions and arguments as well as the points they're rebutting. I'll usually give oral feedback at the end of the round on arguments as well as a decision; if the round is close I might take some extra time to review notes and render a decision offline. I'll also give you notes at the end of the day in Tabroom. Thank you and good luck!

Speak clearly, Dont spread, use studies and evidence that are not manupilated and most importantly have fun while expressing your point of view in simple yet impactful manner.

I'm a parent judge.