Delbarton JV Tournament
2017 — Morristown, NJ/US
Public Forum Paradigm List
All Paradigms: Show HideCFL Policy Update
Judged alot of policy in my career, understand most policy arguments but you should walk me through voting off them (Ks, Topicality, etc. I am comfortable with. Speed isnt an issue if you disclose and honestly probably shouldnt be even if you do not so dont feel obligated.
Email for disclosure brendanjkane1998@gmail.com
(About Me:
I am the Assistant Coach at Xaverian in New York City, in charge of debate (Mainly congress and PF but I have a background in policy and LD) Since I'm mainly going to be judging Congress and Public Forum Debate this year I will break down my paradigm into congress and PF
FOR PF
TLDR tabula rasa - go fast but slow on tags, I like disclosure and evaluate basically any arg but walk me through it
General
At heart I am a tech over truth Flow centric judge who pretty much defaults to a standard offense/defense paradigm. I try my hardest not to be an interventionist IE i try and be tabula rasa. If you plan on doing any weird strategies just run it by me before he round (I.E. run a condo theory shell), because it's very possible I don't have experience with that particular argument(I never really ran them much but I understand most). If I'm not familiar with a technical pre fiat argument, walk me through it because I will be open to voting for it.
I will disclose if the tournament let's me, if they don't and you see me outside of round and I'm not doing anything, feel free to approach me and I'll gladly take out my flow and discuss the round.
Speed
I was always on the faster side so I'm cool with speed, just be aware, if you go super fast, I will stop flowing card names so try not to just extend a card by author last name but instead what it says too (If you slow down on tags I should be fine but most people don't).
LMK before the round if yall plan to be fast or not, I prefer for faster rounds to flow on paper since I am just more use to it from years of debating but if you guys plan to go like 200 WPM I will just flow on my laptop.
Feel free to ask in round if I have been flowing cards but anything south of like 300 I should be able to flow cards unless unforeseen circumstances occur.
If you disclose and I am on the email chain feel free to go as fast as you want.
Evidence Standards
I prefer dates in case and blocks(I get it if you don't but in the future please try). If you lie about evidence I'm at minimum dropping the evidence and at worst dropping you. I will call for evidence if:
A. I'm told to.
B. It's crucial in my decision.
C. I have reason to believe it doesn't say what you say it says
Summary/FF
I expect in first summary you to extend case (PLEASE FRONTLINE YOUR OPPONENT'S RESPONSES) and to extend turns. Terminal Defense does not have to be in first summary. For second summary I expect anything you plan on having be in FF be in summary.
Theory
I don't have the highest threshold for theory but I'll certainly evaluate the argument if it's made.
IDC if it is shell or spike format I will evaluate either.
Road maps
For road maps, I'd much prefer you just tell me where you start if you aren't doing anything insane. If you plan on running an overview I need you to tell me where to flow it.
If the flow gets super super messy feel free to literally take me step by step with your roadmap I trust your judgement here.
Signposting
Just please do it.
It is not my obligation to figure out where things go in a debate- if you signpost poorly things will get lost and I won't evaluate responses you give
Speaker Points (also addresses disclosure)
SO this is the thing that is largest variable in my judging from tournament to tournament. If you respect that I am a flow judge you will probably get good speaks, but how good varies by weekend since I still haven't fully fleshed out how I want my speaker points scale to work out.
No matter what if you disclose your case to your opponents (if you email add me to the email chain brendanjkane 1998@gmail.com so I can verify and because it will make my life easier to flow) I will give .5 extra speaks for doing so.
If it is already on the PF wiki just LMK
Misc
If I flowed on my laptop feel free to email me after with what round and flight I judged you and I can give you my flow.
If anything is unclear in my RFD or comments feel free to email me.
You can be funny and I will appreciate that but if you cross the line I will lower speaks.
If your case is like 1K plus words I will flow it on 2 pieces of paper so signpost or else things will get lost.
Don't feel you have to wait for me to enter the room or do a coin flip.
I am human I may make the wrong decision but in the end I will try my best to fairly evaluate the round.
@PFVideos If someone wants to record the round plz get consent from both teams (if one team competing is recording PLZ ask the other if this is okay) if I discover one team is recording without consent I will drop that team. If you get consent feel free to record my RFD if you want
Still have yet to squirrel
Congress
General
So I've watched and competed in a lot of congress rounds and am an assistant coach mainly in congress. If I am parling a round you are in I will track reverse activity(If PO is using it to select questioners) and recency for speeches. If I am not parling I will not, but I usually can tell even without a recency chart if you mess up. I tend to flow the round, and I write my ballot during questioning(if there is no questioning, then I will not be flowing or else I would not have time to write your ballots).
Feel free to ask me questions about your performance after I've submitted my ballot (if I'm parling between session or after the tournament), I'll be happy to share my thoughts.
If I parli
very non interventionist or I try to be unless an issue with fairness arises
Authorships/Sponsors
I unlike most other judges truly value a solid author that sets up a debate. I understand that in the SQuo, authors (especially on the second bill of a session) are really discouraged and I get it, but I personally make an effort to try to not continue that skew.
Something also that differentiates me is that if your bill produces a solid, balanced debate, I will give you a bonus for it(this is my way of rewarding good, balanced bills).
Clash/Preemptive Responses
In regards to Clash, I expect It in every speech past the first affirmative.
For preemptive responses, I feel they often are disjointed whenever I hear them (that shouldn't discourage you but should let you know that I rarely see it done properly). If it's done properly I'll appreciate it
Late Speeches
In later speeches I expect more clash than new arguments.
Just aside I have noticed in my own judging that I rank people who frame debates very well- take that how you will
IE Events
I don't think anyone has ever looked at an IE paradigm, if I'm judging you in a speech round and you've read this please tell me, since it enough people do I will write one.
If you have any questions for me before your speech feel free to ask.