Conway Classic at Gonzaga University
2018
—
WA/US
Congress Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
MacLean Andrews
Gonzaga Prep HS
Last changed on
Sat December 7, 2019 at 2:39 AM PDT
MacLean Andrews—Gonzaga Prep
I debated policy in high school and NPDA/NPTE parli at Point Loma. I then coached NPDA/NPTE at PLNU. I am now the Director of Forensics at Gonzaga Prep in Spokane, WA. I mostly coach and judge high school CX and LD now. I see debate as an academic game and that’s how I will judge the round. Please feel free to ask me any questions before the round or email me if you have questions while filling out pref sheets (first initial last name at gprep.com)
1.Speaker points
- 28-29.9 usually.
2.Critical Arguments
- I think there are critical implications to every speech act. Affirmative cases, topicalities, procedurals, kritiks, and performances can all be critically analyzed if the teams take the debate there. I am more than willing to listen to any type/kind of arguments but nothing will make me cringe more than a bad K debate. In the end it is up to the debaters in the round to tell me what framework I am to use to evaluate the round.
3.Topicality.
- I tend to see T through a competing interpretations framework unless told so otherwise. I used to say that I have a fairly high threshold for T but I am finding myself voting for it more and more. If it is the best strategy you have to win the round go for it.
4.Theory
- I am willing to listen to all theory arguments as long as a team can give me a reason to vote on the position. Theory positions should have a framework/interp, arguments for your position, and voters/impacts. Simply stating fairness or education as voting issues usually isn’t enough to win. Impact out why fairness or education or (insert voter) is important.
5.Weighing Arguments
- I will default to Net Bens…but if you want to use an alternative weighing mechanism please explain and provide justification for it.
- I appreciate it when weighing is done in the speeches. The last thing you want is for me to have to weigh your arguments for you.
7.Random Thoughts
- Speed is great if clear.
- The round is for the debaters, do what you have to do to win. I will try to adapt to you instead of you adapting to me.
- Impact calc wins debates
- Debate should be fun.
Nicole Bishop
Mt. Spokane High School
None
Eric Boose
Lewis and Clark High School
None
Last changed on
Sat January 13, 2024 at 9:52 AM EDT
I like a traditional, value-centric debate. The clash of value / criterion is critical, and supporting contentions should be clearly linked. I do not mind unique approaches to the topics, but I prefer the focus to reaming on the value clash and ability to show its influence on the contentions and evidence chosen. Extended analysis can include social impact, both pro and con.
Michael Dennis
Mead High School
None
Brenda Farrar
Nampa Sr HS
Last changed on
Thu January 4, 2018 at 10:27 AM MDT
I would like not to see speed, please speak clearly so that I can hear and understand all you are trying to get across to me. I like citations for sources. Please give clear logical argumentation and clear tag lines. Convince me and you win.
Donovan Guiga
Hire
4 rounds
None
Last changed on
Wed January 3, 2018 at 1:11 AM MDT
I like clear logical argumentation and refutation and clear tag-lines. I do not like to be read at in top speed. Whomever can convince me that their case is better wins the round.
Will Hope
Ferris High School
None
Sara Hyde
Chiawana High School
Last changed on
Mon June 17, 2024 at 8:52 AM PDT
I am a coach (Washington) with most of my skills and training in speech. My high school events (Oregon and Montana) were oratory and interps. When it comes to debate, I am not as experienced though I have been judging it regularly at smaller local tournaments. I have been coaching for over 5 years and attended nationals 3 times. I did judge Big Questions at nationals one year.
I prefer traditional LD and a conversational speaking pace. This is a values debate so you should focus on convincing me that your value is more applicable and that your criterion uphold it better than the opponents. It isn't about how many points you win, but winning the most important ones. If you can show that your side also upholds your opponents value- even better.
Coming from the speech side of things, I appreciate clear organization and speaking skills. Make me want to keep listening (or at least not want to stop). You can have a personality.
I am not a fan of tricks or trying to make it so there's nothing your opponent can really argue against. I want to see both sides being able to bring good ideas and counter things their opponents says. I want this to be a tough decision. Respect your opponents and me and have fun.
shyde@psd1.org
Scott Kennedy
Lake City High School
None
Adelle Kincel
Mt. Spokane High School
None
Kiersten Leslie
University HS
None
Justin Petersen
Capital HS
Last changed on
Tue March 3, 2020 at 11:58 AM MDT
I am a scientific individual, I am listening for credible facts, quotes, sources and empirical evidence.
Be knowledgeable on the topic, if a question is asked I expect some type of answer, not "I don't know".
Presentation of your argument(s) is a factor as well, your job is to persuade me to vote with you. Congress specifically, don't just read your speech, make eye contact and let us hear your passion and research that you've completed.
Elaborate on the impacts using the 5 Ws (who, what, when, where and why).
Gabe Ring
Coeur D'Alene HS
Last changed on
Thu January 4, 2018 at 4:11 AM MDT
I'm a 3 year congress debater. I like to see eye contact. I hate seeing competitors stand up and just read. Need to be proffesional when asking and answering questions.
Misty Stephens
Mt. Spokane High School
None
Bill Wagstaff
Mead High School
6 rounds
None