Georgia Northern Mountain District Tournament
2019
—
Speech (District Tournament, All Events) Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
Elizabeth Brown
Cherokee
None
Glenn Bryant
North Hall HS
None
Walter Cotter
Lassiter HS
Last changed on
Thu January 11, 2024 at 11:00 AM EDT
I am a traditional judge.
Do not spread.
Civility is essential.
I value clear communication. Sign posts and voters are excellent tools.
I value clash. So listen to your opponent and tell me why they are wrong and your side is better.
Give weight to the most important arguments and tell me why they are the most important.
Write the reason for decision for me.
Alison Earles
Henry W Grady
8 rounds
None
Vicki Gray
Henry W Grady
8 rounds
None
Jon Greiver
Dunwoody High
None
Mary Campbell Jenkins
Henry W Grady
None
Katie Maher
Sequoyah High School
None
Sara Martin
Cherokee
None
Last changed on
Thu May 17, 2018 at 3:46 PM EDT
I am actually a Speech judge so I will be looking for proper syntax and good delivery. I will weigh arguments with ethos and pathos heavier. Please do not spread or I will deduct points.
Last changed on
Fri February 23, 2018 at 4:29 PM EDT
I will start by letting you know I am a parent judge with no debate experience.
I do not enjoy spreading and often can get lost when a debater spreads.
I enjoy a spirited, but respectful cross ex.
As I face the debaters I prefer the Aff on my left and the Neg on my right.
Make sure you clearly outline your case. If you get deep into philosphy or obsure philosophers be prepared to provide clear explanations.
Things that I look for are evenly paced delivery, good enunciation, and proper management of the time you are allotted.
I do not allow for the conversion of prep time to cross ex.
As this article outlines, I come down on the side of not wanting to listen to an auctioneer.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/ifyoucanunderstandthisyoumightbeahighschooldebater-1518021742?mod=searchresults&page=1&pos=1
Kristopher Pinson
Hire
8 rounds
None
Last changed on
Sat November 9, 2019 at 6:00 AM EDT
My preference is for strong, simple arguments that focus on the core of what is being discussed. I don't respond to side-arguments, nor to rhetorical tricks that don't engage with the core of the debate.
I also dislike spreading. I would always prefer that you make one or two strong, well-reasoned and clear arguments to trying to jam in four arguments and talking at a non-understandable rate of speed.
Bring your strong arguments and let's have a debate!
Joe Ruvo
Dunwoody High
None
Suzanne Sheely Walker
Hire
8 rounds
None
Kelsey South
Dunwoody High
None
Rand Stewart
Archer High School
None
Charity Wang
R W Johnson
None
Steven Wang
North Hall HS
Last changed on
Tue April 2, 2024 at 4:04 AM EDT
I look for rational, linear argumentation. Please do not advance contentions/make arguments without providing adequate warrant/evidence. Please avoid negating your own argument(s) with circular or incomplete warrants/reasoning. Please do not abuse your opponent. Civility will gain much more than overly agressive pursuit. Spreading is perhaps fine, but it had better consist of completed arguments (claim AND warrant) rather than scatter gun approaches designed as insurmountable "gotcha" gimmicks to merely trap your opponents into "dropping" arguments. If your claims and warrants don't actually WORK, then I'm highly unlikely to count them as actual arguments, and your opponent cannot drop arguments that weren't completed on your part. Also, if your speed is so rapid that I cannot flow it, then those are arguments you didn't successfully make, and which your opponent cannot actually "drop." Please do not present me with "theater of the absurd" contentions that are off topic or so bizzarely twisted that they are abusive to your opponent. Such tactics will not be rewarded as voters. Off time road mapping is, to me, highly suspect, as it can quickly appear to be an attempt to abuse the time constraints and thus abuse one's opponent, and leaves an overall bad taste in my mouth (not to mention in the mouth/mouths of your opponent/opponents). If you just MUST off time road map, then, of course, you will want to keep it to a minimum, .... but be aware that really ANY of it appears to me to be suspect/abusive. Please contain your claims and warrants to terms and phrases whose definitions you FULLY understand, and with which you are comfortable and fluent in pronouncing. Just because it is on the card doesn't mean it can't seriously break up your flow if you mis pronounce it or wholly or partially misunderstand all the implications it has. DO flow your opponents' arguments carefully, and feel free to turn claims that aren't warranted, or that are poorly warranted. Being able to so do with terms used by an opponent who clearly doesn't understand ALL implications, without being a wiseacre about it are often rewarded in voting.
Diana Waters
Northview High School
Last changed on
Fri January 19, 2024 at 10:09 AM EDT
I am best described as a parent judge. I listen to your arguments and take notes. I will vote on the team that makes the most convincing arguments in the rounds.
Be nice to each other and be respectful.
Jamie Wills
Cherokee
None