Last changed on
Sun January 27, 2019 at 2:47 PM EDT
I vote for the side that better convinces me, so make logical, coherent arguents and speak clearly so I can understand you. I will not tolerate spreading in the round; if you spread in the round, I may vote against you for that reason alone. Also, I dislike tech. So, avoid running DA's, counterplans, plans, theory, kritiks, and other technical arguments.
The way I judge is straightforward and methodical. Keep this in mind when I am judging your debate. This is the way I judge rounds:
1. First I decide which framework (i.e. value and value criterion) is best suited for the round
2. Then, I go through each contention on either side individually and evaluate whether the aff or neg on each contention. If the aff won an affirmative contention, then I will consider that in my final decision. However, if the neg won that contention, I will drop that contention. Same goes for the neg side.
3. Finally, I weigh the standing contentions on each side against each other. I decide which contention(s) are stronger in the context of the winning framework.
So, these are the things you should do to win a round that I am judging:
1. First and foremost, do not spread. I cannot understand a debater that spreads and will tend to vote against them. As a general rule, do not talk faster than 7.
2. To ensure that I catch all the most important parts of your case (like the value, value criterion, and each of your contentions), try to slow down and emphasize when you are introducing your framework and each of your contentions. Throughout your entire case, speak clearly.
3. Make sure you clearly advocate for why you won your contentions and why your opponent lost their contentions.
4. Make strong weighing arguments and explain clearly why your contentions fit the winning framework better than the opponent's contentions.
5. Keep track of time and maintain formality throughout the round.
I am looking forward to judging your debates. Good luck debaters!