Bixby Middle School Invitational
2021 — NSDA Campus, OK/US
PF LD Paradigm List
All Paradigms: Show Hide(I don't particularly care whether you call me Haneen ((it's pronounced like honey-n)) or Ms. Awadallah ((it's pronounced exactly as it looks, don't worry)), but I do go by she/her pronouns and I do care about remaining respectful throughout the round.)
-No spreading; some speed is okay as long as it's still understandable.
-No Ks.
-No theoryshells.
-Strongly prefer roadmaps.
-Puns are highly appreciated.
-Strong supporter of debate rules; don't toy and bend them. Time limits are limits; after 10-second grace period, I will stop flowing.
-If your opponent drops an argument, you have to point it out; I cannot and will not hold it against them otherwise.
-No ghost dropping.
-Feel free to ask me questions before the debate! :D I'm excited to meet and listen to all of you; if you want to ask me about my paradigm or just a general question about debate before we begin, I'm here for it!
I prefer a logical argument with voice that is understandable. Your ability to present convincingly your structure, arguments and cross will earn you speaker points.
I'm a current high school debater.
1. I'm okay with some speed, but not spreading
2. Please don't run critiques (Ks), or theory shells. It's irrelevant.
3. I want to see roadmaps and signposting (tell me if something is from a rebuttal or contention 1)
4. You have to tell me how to vote. If both sides disagree on how I should vote, I expect arguments that sway me toward your framework.
5. Emphasize impacts
6. Ultimately, I will vote for whichever side persuades me best. Good luck.
email: shaniaraimer@gmail.com
For all debate:
-Talking fast is perfectly fine, but please don't spread (i.e., gasping for air, incoherent mumbling)
***If you're talking too fast, I'll say "clear" once just to let you know.
***If there's an email chain, I'll refer to your case to look at evidence -- but I'm only flowing what I hear!
-Hit the framework at the top of each speech & often (especially for LD!)
-I'll buy any argument so long as it has a claim/warrant/impact.
-Ks are fine, just argue and explain them very well.
-Speaker points will reflect delivery, speech organization, & quality of arguments.
-For the sake of having the round run on time, please be ready to upload your doc(s) right after your prep ends! After 30 seconds pass, I'll resume your prep.
-Lastly, have fun!
A little about me :)
Marcus Repsher
I have done PF for 5 years among other speech/debate events
Student at Bixby highschool
What I consider interventionist on the judges part and I will not do
I will not call for evidence unless told to by your team
I will not decide if a teams argument is factually based on my own knowledge of the topic that is up for you to prove to me
I will not ask clarifying questions after the round
my job as the judge is to simply observe all information presented to me and the way you want me to interpret it so please tell me how
Debate stuff
I will evaluate literally any k, shell, or random theory (within reason...) just make your interp clear, if you decide you want to change the norms of debate and turn this into a theory round I'm 100% behind you if you can make your line of reasoning sound and explain violations etc.
style- I am not a progressive debater in the sense of ks and non-topical arguments but i will go along with most things but that doesn't mean I enjoy hearing shoe theory or the like.
Flow/tech judge
Tech > Truth almost 100% of the time
Debate is not a game and is to be considered much more than just that rudimentary definition. Remember the topics you discuss often have real-world impacts that affect others and or your opponents, debate isn't always about the ballot.
TW/CONTENT WARNING/Misgendering
I am a firm believer in TW theory and the violence that can be caused by debaters not reading content warnings before potentially triggering topics. I ask that you read your case before the round and consider with each contention if it needs a CW, if there is even a question about the contention needing one please include it before the content is read. If your plan is to read a case that includes potential triggering content as most topics have, please include some format of an anonymous opt-out system and a backup case/contention. If in the event these standards are not met I am fully prepared to drop the debater or tank their speaks. If you have any questions about this/your case please speak to me before the round or coin flip. I will fight tab about dropping the debater who violates this before I allow debate to become an exclusionary event.
TKO
At any time you can Invoke a TKO (Technical knock out) and I will end the debate there with a win to your team and award you 30 speaks, however if not your speaks will be set at 20. This basically means that at any point of the debate you believe you’ve solidly already won the debate, beyond a reasonable doubt, (dropped T argument, double turn, strategic miscue that is irreparable by the other team) you can invoke a TKO and immediately end the debate BUT only do this if you believe that your opponent has absolutely no route to the ballot.
Some other stuffs
Run whatever you want, I will do my best to follow. Judge adaption is a sorry excuse for lay judges to be lazy and not actually learn debate.
You may read your cases as fast as you would like, but if you would like me to flow key cards or points please slow down on them or send me your speech doc.
If you plan on running very long link chains please explain them to a full extent or include me on an email chain- marcus.repsher@gmail.com
if evidence is asked for at the end of a round please make sure the entire card is at least an 8 point font or I assume you don't want me to read it.
If in Lincoln Douglas, the same goes for card font also if your running unique Criteria or Value please explain them to the full extent if you wish for them to be flowed.
I usually value tech over the truth but I do not think in a strict offense/defense paradigm. Terminal defense, presumption, and negligible risk are possible.
post rounding is acceptable if you have nice things to say or questions for me or your opponent, post rounding is not the time nor the place to argue my RFD, if you absolutely disagree with my RFD please take it to your coach or a tournament director arguing with me in round will get you nowhere.
PUBLIC FORUM
Public Forum is an evidence-based debate.
Do not rant during speeches, be absolutely clear and precise.
The basics of every round and the way I am going to judge, the AFF must prove a net gain, the NEG must prove a net loss, unless offered a framework or observation this is how i will judge your round.
I do not mind sitting during grand cross, during 1st speaker and 2nd speaker cross i do prefer you stand.
There is a difference between being assertive and rude.
I will assume you to be well versed in the rules in public forum, understand I will mark it on your ballot if you do not follow them.
I will assume if you drop an argument or contention whether it be offense or defense you agree with it and will flow it to your opponent's side unless they don't mention the drop then ill just pretend like I was hallucinating.
If you would like me to understand exactly what your doing, please give some format of an off time road map before each speech after case reading. basically PLEASE SIGNPOST
If you don't offer a framework of what you need to prove to win or the opponent needs to prove, i will hold your opponents framework in the round (technically you should just adopt their framework but you get the idea), If neither of the teams offer one I will decide the round over the weighing that has been offered to me.
Crossfire- unlike many flow judges I do flow cross x as i believe it holds value to the debate or you wouldn't be doing it.
Impacts- Do not give me anything scalar without explaining why it matters.
Weighting- If you have dropped the arg or lost access to it don't use it as a weighing mechanism. weighting is an action not a word to be used for fill.
drops/concedes- I am a flow judge i promise i caught the drop/conceded arg, so if your going to tell me that something was dropped or conceded tell me why its important rather than "this went cold conceded!!!"
style- I am not a progressive debater in the sense of ks and non-topical arguments but i will go along with most things but that doesn't mean i enjoy hearing debate is always bad K's
Lincoln Douglas
Do not rant during speeches, be absolutely clear and precise.
The basics of every round and the way I am going to judge, the AFF must prove a net gain, the NEG must prove a net loss. Of course other factors will be taken into consideration but this is the very basics.
I will assume if you drop an argument or contention whether it be offense or defense you agree with it and will flow it to your opponent's side unless they don't mention the drop then ill just pretend like I was hallucinating.
If you would like me to understand exactly what your doing, please give some format of an off time road map before each speech after case reading. basically PLEASE SIGNPOST
There is a difference between being assertive and rude, please understand the difference.
You can stand or sit during cross, doesn't matter much to me.
I will assume you understand the rules of Lincoln Douglas debate, understand I will mark it on your ballot if you do not follow them.
Please understand these are the absolute basics of how I will judge your round. Of course other factors will influence my decision, but that is tailored to each round.
Crossfire- unlike many flow judges i do flow cross x as i believe it holds value to the debate or you wouldn't be doing it.
Impacts- Do not give me anything scalar without explaining why it matters.
Weighting- If you have dropped the arg or lost access to it don't use it as a weighing mechanism. weighting is an action not a word to be used for fill.
drops/concedes- I am a flow judge i promise i caught the drop/conceded arg, so if your going to tell me that something was dropped or conceded tell me why its important rather then "this went cold conceded!!!"
style- I am not a progressive debater in the sense of ks and non-topical arguments but i will go along with most things but that doesn't mean i enjoy hearing debate is always bad K's
General rules
I do not tolerate mansplaining
I'm not an interventionist judge in any sense I weigh the round how you tell me to, I will, however, become interventionist when you become homophobic, racist, transphobic, or any other form of bigotry.
If you are going to spread, please ask all parties involved before the round starts (aka case reading).
If you ask me to disclose after round, I will but only if asked.
Do not trap your opponents into some terrible tunnel vision of a framework. (I know this doesnt translate to everyone so if you have a question about this ask me before round)
Please keep cross as professional as possible, I understand the want to prove a point, this does not mean you can be rude to your opponent.
Please take any critique that I give you to heart, I am in no way a snobby judge who will get mad if you move your hands too much, I really wish for you to do better.
Of course all of this goes deeper and if I listed all rules I think debaters should follow we would be here all day. The most important rule is for you to go to a tournament and enjoy yourself, debate is in no way meant to be a exclusive rude community.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ASK BEFORE THE ROUND STARTS
No spreading, speed is acceptable though. Please include a roadmap before speeches. Please don’t run K’s or theory shells. I weigh the round based off what you tell me to weigh the round on. Most of all, have fun!