Stratford Shamrock
2022
—
NSDA Campus,
CA/US
Debate Judges Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
Sai Ankireddi
Stratford Milpitas
Last changed on
Sat January 13, 2024 at 12:05 AM PDT
Lay judge, no spreading. I have judged Congress to oi to policy. I will always write long form notes on in round speeches, but I may not set up my flow like conventional debaters.
sai.ankireddi@gmail.com
Balpreet Bedi
Ravenwood High School
None
Anindita Bhattacharya
Stratford Milpitas
Last changed on
Fri March 15, 2024 at 11:56 AM PDT
I am a parent judge new to debate, expecting students to speak slowly and clearly. Please only assume that I would sometimes know about the topic beforehand. In addition, I might need students to explain their voting issues clearly.
Hamesh Chawla
Stratford Milpitas
None
Mun Piao Cheong
Stratford Sunnyvale Raynor Middle School
None
Saravanan Devarajan
Stratford Milpitas
None
Pranoop Erasani
Stratford Osgood
None
Sutithee Guha
Stratford Milpitas
None
John Huang
Stratford Sunnyvale Raynor Middle School
None
Matthew Hutaff
Flintridge Preparatory
None
Tresa Johnson
Stratford Middle School - San Jose
None
Rohit Mittal
Stratford Sunnyvale Raynor Middle School
Last changed on
Fri January 28, 2022 at 10:14 AM PDT
I just have a few suggestions on what I value.
a) Logical arguments. Please have a coherent structure to your arguments. Back up your arguments with evidence/data. And make sure your arguments are impactful.
b) Speed: I value medium speed at the expense of too many arguments. Don't be too fast. I won't vote you higher based on the number of arguments.
Good luck and have fun!
Srikanth Muttumu
Stratford Milpitas
None
Satya Nalluri
Stratford Sunnyvale Raynor Middle School
None
Ramya Narayana
Stratford Sunnyvale Raynor Middle School
None
Anupama Patil
Stratford Middle School - San Jose
Last changed on
Sun February 5, 2023 at 1:54 AM PDT
Please introduce yourselves and state the topic before the round begins. Also state Road-map (OFF TIME) and tell me where you are going. It helps me understand your case better. As a rule I do not time road maps.
Please avoid snarky comments and approach the arguments with politeness and respect.If someone gets nasty with you, stay classy and trust me to punish them for it with speaks.
I understand your case more when there is voice modulation in your speech, reading as is from a screen makes it hard to follow and seems uninteresting. I love to see when you speak with passion and when it seems like you really mean what you are say.
Don't have to ask me if I am ready before beginning each section of the round.
Please manage the timers yourselves.
Harikrishnan Rajagopal
Stratford Sunnyvale Raynor Middle School
None
Edward Rumbos-Perez
Flintridge Preparatory
Last changed on
Fri April 12, 2024 at 9:20 AM PDT
Hi o/
I'm currently an undergrad at UC Berkeley and an assistant Speech and Debate coach. I'm a former debater who mainly competed in Parliamentary debate for Claremont High School. Alongside that, I've competed in and/or judged LD, PF, Worlds, BQ, Congress, and several speech events (mainly Impromptu/Extemp). I always appreciate a competitive and respectful round so I'm looking forward to hearing what you have to say!
General Debate Notes
Please focus on your links! I believe they are just as/more important than your cards/impacts. Arguments that depend on well-thought out logic are always more interesting to listen to than a random card without much analysis from the debater. I weigh magnitude and probability heavily, meaning I will not vote for your nuclear holocaust argument just because you tell me to based on a 0.0000000001% chance. Please provide a roadmap and signpost in each speech! I want to be able to flow your case/refutations as accurately as possible and it's difficult when you spew random facts at me for 7 minutes. Remember, you could have the most beautiful argument to ever be conceived of in human history, but if I don't know where/how to flow it I can't give you credit. Lastly, be respectful! Especially during POIs and cross. That also means avoid making faces or facepalming while your camera is on, I'll probably tank speaks if a debater is being disrespectful throughout the round.
Kritiks & Theory
I'm open to hearing these arguments as long as you can justify them. There are definitely rounds where these arguments are necessary and will impact my decision. I'm not the most familiar with K's so please explain each component to me! If there's one thing I hate more than spreading, it's frivolous theory/k's that you wrote at camp 5 months ago and decided to shoe into your case. Make sure the K actually makes sense for the specific round, not one that you already decided to run before the topic is even announced. (It's an exclusionary tactic against new debaters and makes me sad
). Don't feel pressured to run these arguments either, you don't need to use jargon or this structure to explain why a definition or argument is abusive!
Speaking
I'm pretty generous when it comes to speaks. If you make me laugh I'm probably going to boost your speaks too. Be respectful to your opponents, being rude is an easy way for me to dock your speaks without feeling very bad. Don't Spread, Don't Spread, Don't Spread.
If you have any other questions feel free to ask them in round! :)
glhf ![cool](https://www.tabroom.com/lib/javascript/tinymce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-cool.gif)
Seshadri Sathyanarayan
Stratford Sunnyvale Raynor Middle School
None
Welie Shen
Stratford Middle School - San Jose
None
Yogesh Sontakke
Stratford Middle School - San Jose
None
Sreeja Sreedharan
Stratford Sunnyvale Raynor Middle School
None
Sally Veguru
Stratford Osgood
None
Shawn Wang
Stratford Middle School - San Jose
Last changed on
Fri January 12, 2024 at 2:23 PM PDT
I have served as a judge for debate for four years and I prefer slower speech with proper short pauses.
For congressional debate, I would love to see new arguments that really advance the debate.
For speech, I prefer the structured approach with emphasis and rigor logic.
David Yin
Stratford Middle School - San Jose
Last changed on
Thu February 4, 2021 at 1:24 AM PDT
I have judged a couple of tournaments and have no debate experience myself. When judging, I look for powerful delivery, insightful analysis and ease of handling questions.
Always be respectful to your opponent.
Keep a clear, structured and consistent narrative throughout the entire round.
Ling Zhao
Stratford Sunnyvale Raynor Middle School
Last changed on
Sat March 2, 2024 at 7:02 AM PDT
Philosophy: As a judge, my primary goal is to impartially evaluate the arguments presented by both sides of the debate. I firmly believe in the importance of logical reasoning, critical thinking, and the presentation of coherent, well-supported arguments. I strive to maintain neutrality throughout the debate and base my decisions solely on the merits of the arguments presented.
Listening Approach: I approach each debate with a commitment to active listening. I will carefully consider each speaker's points, weighing their validity and relevance to the resolution. It is essential for debaters to articulate their arguments clearly and concisely, allowing me to grasp the core of their positions.
Expectations: I expect debaters to adhere to the principles of logic and reason in their speeches. Arguments should be supported by evidence, logic, and sound reasoning rather than relying on emotional appeals or fallacious tactics. Clarity of thought and expression is key to persuading me of the strength of an argument.
Evaluation Criteria:
- Logic and Reasoning: I prioritize arguments that demonstrate logical coherence and are supported by relevant evidence.
- Clarity and Organization: Debaters should present their arguments in a clear and organized manner, making it easy for me to follow their line of reasoning.
- Relevance to Resolution: Arguments should directly address the resolution and contribute meaningfully to the debate's central theme.
- Respectful Conduct: I expect debaters to engage in civil discourse and respect their opponents, avoiding personal attacks or disrespectful behavior.
Decision-Making Process: I will carefully weigh the arguments presented by both sides, considering their strength, relevance, and persuasiveness. I may take notes during the debate to help me remember key points and evaluate the overall flow of the arguments. Ultimately, my decision will be based on which side presents the most compelling case in support of their position.
Final Thoughts: I approach each debate as an opportunity to engage with complex issues and learn from the perspectives of others. I encourage debaters to challenge themselves and each other intellectually, fostering a productive exchange of ideas that contributes to a deeper understanding of the topic at hand.