Coast Forensic League CFL Speech 3
2024
—
Milpitas,
CA/US
Speech Judging Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
Wadiyat Abbas
Monta Vista High School
None
Trilok Agarwal
Leland High School
None
Sofia Agboatwalla
Leland High School
Last changed on
Fri January 26, 2024 at 9:13 AM PDT
Anuj Aggarwal
Bellarmine College Preparatory
Last changed on
Fri January 12, 2024 at 8:39 AM PDT
Hello all, I am a parent judge and I have been judging LD, PF, and other individual events for the last 3-4 years.
DECISION:My decision evaluates all scopes of the debate: framework, arguments, reasoning, evidence, links, etc. However, telling me why your IMPACTS are important and how you better achieve them than your opponent is key for you to win this debate. I do not care about what kind of impacts you give me, but it would be good if you start out with specifics and then at the end you summarize with broad ones so I know where you are deriving your impacts from.
FLOWING: I will flow a line-by-line analysis, however, I prefer OVERVIEWS (not only in your 2ars or 2nrs) because they clear things up for me and make the ballot easier too.
OTHER PREFERENCES: For speaking, please speak clearly and speak to the point. In terms of speed, please do NOT SPREAD . If you speak marginally fast or faster than conversational, it is okay as long as you slow down at the impactful parts, tags, numbers you want me to flow, etc. Do NOT RUN THEORY because I will probably not understand it or flow it. By chance if I do flow part of your theory argument , it will not be a major evaluation in the debate and I will probably just ignore it.
HAVE FUN DEBATING ;)
Mahendra Kumar Reddy Alipeta Ramareddy
Cupertino High School
None
Mehmet Altinel
Leland High School
None
rahul ambli
Leland High School
None
Santhi Andrews
Archbishop Mitty
None
Ravinder Annapureddy
Cupertino High School
None
Vinay Anneboina
Valley Christian High School
None
SHAN Anwar
Clean Judges
None
Raghu Appanagari
Presentation High School
None
Poonam Arora
Evergreen Valley
None
Muhammad Asif
Clean Judges
None
Mona Azari
Leland High School
None
Thalli Badrinath
Clean Judges
None
Yang Bai
Valley Christian High School
None
Zvonimir Bandic
Leland High School
None
Lynbrook-Aayush Bandopadhyay
Lynbrook HS
None
Kislay Banka
Clean Judges
Last changed on
Fri January 5, 2024 at 6:04 AM PDT
I am a lay judge, so whenever you talk about anything, please make sure that you explain it thoroughly. I know little to nothing about this topic so just keep that in mind.
How I will vote.
1. The first thing that I will take into consideration is whoever proves more convincing to me, whoever proves that the benefits outweigh the harms or that the harms outweigh the benefits. I would greatly appreciate if you could weigh with your impacts on the three scales, magnitude, probability, and timeframe.
2. Whoever debates better. I would also vote for a team that refutes all of their opponents points compared to a team that drops all of their opponents points. Whoever keeps their case alive at the end, and destroys their opponents or whoever convinces me to vote for them in this way will definitely earn my ballot.
Not as important but I may include some of this in my decision
1. PLEASE TIME YOURSELVES. For example: If you take like a minute of prep extra and YOUR OPPONENTS POINT THIS OUT TO ME, this will affect my decision. Please use your respective amount of time for speeches, there is a 10 second grace period after every speech, and 3 minutes for prep.
2. PLEASE BE RESPECTFUL. Although this is competitive, it is still done for fun. There shall be no disrespect shown to anyone else, as this is a formal setting and must be looked upon as.
3. PLEASE NO SPREADING. IF you do so, I may not catch everything which will affect my decision.
Shilpa Bansod
Leland High School
Last changed on
Fri January 26, 2024 at 1:00 AM PDT
I am a lay judge.
For debate :
1) You can expect me to know something about the topic at hand. I look for clarity of thought, logic in your arguments and how you link the evidence.
2) Please speak at a reasonable pace, do not spread.
3) Please stay respectful at all times.
For speech :
1) I look for effectiveness of your speech - be it through listener engagement, clarity of idea, or variety of examples (depending on event type).
2) If you can convey your ideas to me, convince me of authenticity, you will have my attention.
Natasha Barringer
Clean Judges
None
Last changed on
Sat January 13, 2024 at 12:22 AM PDT
I am a beginner judge of speech and debate tournaments.
For speech tournaments, the guiding principles that I use to judge participants include the following:
- Was the speech compelling? Was it well delivered with maturity, poise, and a demonstrated understanding of the topic?
- Was the logic in the speech sound?
- How well did the speaker present? Did they use effective gestures and facial queues? Did they speak fluently? Were there nervous ticks or unnecessary adds such as the use of "like" or "just" repeatedly throughout the presentation?
For debate tournaments, I look for the following:
- Is the logic used in the debate sound? Are there inconsistencies or logic leaps that make the argument difficult or impossible to follow?
- Did the AF team effectively present a plan that I could understand?
- Did the Neg team present an alternative or effectively refute the plan presented?
- Was evidence used effectively?
- Were ideas communicated in a way that was understandable?
- Which team made the most compelling arguments/which team was able to respond most effectively to key points of the opponent to make or refute a case?
I do my best to remove any bias based on prior knowledge or a topic and/or presenter characteristics.
Hey guys this is Austin, Joel's son here to tell you a little bit about my dad. He is a LAY judge. NO SPREADING. you will lose if you do this. Don't run medium arguments and use jargon like internal link. It will not work well for you. My dad has been working in cyber for 20 years so he knows stuff about cyber but will listen to evidence.
Rupen Bavishi
Clean Judges
None
David Becker
Westmont
None
Gabriel Benedek
Leland High School
None
Last changed on
Sat January 20, 2024 at 10:59 PM PDT
Hello! I am a parent judge supporting my oldest son's speech aspirations. Now in my 7th year as a speech parent, judge, and sorta coach I have judged 100+ rounds and hundreds of presentations across middle school and high school competitions - primarily in OO, HI, DI, Duo and more. I judged the NSDA nationals DI finals in 2022 which was an incredible round and experience. I also judged the middle school NSDA final round for storytelling in 2019 along with plenty of state and nat quals through the years. Across various events, here are my thoughts as applicable for your event...
I hope to be persuaded by your thesis or argument
I want to be engaged and moved by your presentation
Your characters should be fully developed and come through clearly and distinctly
Use sources responsibly to complement your work without overwhelming with stats and figures
Show creativity and something novel relative to other competitors
Most of all, own your work, have fun, and know that you are a winner just by competing. Thank you!
Lani Bergevin
Clean Judges
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 12:27 AM PDT
I am a lay judge who has three years of experience in judging PF.
Please speak on the slow side; I will not vote for you if I cannot understand your arguments.
I vote off of clearly explained link chains and impacts. Make your case and narrative the easiest to understand, and you will get my ballot. Make my job easier and explain why I should vote for your team.
I will drop you for racist, sexist, or xenophobic comments/attitude.
Have fun!
Kurt Berney
Palo Alto High School
None
Shannon Bhat
Gunn Sr High School
None
Rajesh Bhatia
Mountain View High School
None
Dhiman Bhattacharjee
Clean Judges
Last changed on
Sat January 20, 2024 at 3:20 AM PDT
I am a parent judge new to speech and debate, expecting students to speak slowly and clearly. Please just assume that I would sometimes know about the topic beforehand. In addition, I might need students to explain their voting issues clearly.
Gayatri Bhide
Evergreen Valley
None
Shikha Biswari
Monta Vista High School
None
Terry Blay
Leland High School
Last changed on
Mon February 5, 2024 at 5:43 AM PDT
I am a parent judge. Please speak clearly and enunciate. Have fun
Dondi Bogusky
Clean Judges
None
Keita Broadwater
Clean Judges
None
Joanne Bugarin
Monta Vista High School
None
Lynbrook-Ronglun Cai
Lynbrook HS
None
Bill Cameron
Presentation High School
None
Alexandra Campbell
Presentation High School
None
John CAO
Valley Christian High School
Last changed on
Fri January 19, 2024 at 11:20 AM PDT
Public Forum
Emphasize logic and flow, facts & evidences; value respect and professionalism. Manner, behavior and sincerity matters.
Judged in SCU & North Bay.
Chandni Chadha
Leland High School
None
Soumendu Chakraborty
Clean Judges
None
Anuj Chakrapani
Clean Judges
None
Hyeyoung Chang
Cupertino High School
Last changed on
Fri February 2, 2024 at 12:12 PM PDT
Welcome! As a parent judge, I'm excited to hear your speech and witness your development as a speaker. Here's what I value in your presentation:
Clarity:
- Articulate Pronunciation:Speak clearly and enunciate each word carefully.Ensure your audience understands you without straining.
- Defined Vocabulary:Use words that are appropriate for the audience and avoid overly complex language.Explain technical terms if necessary.
- Organized Structure:Present your content in a logical order with clear transitions between points.This helps your audience follow your train of thought.
Pace and Delivery:
- Moderate Speed:Speak at a pace that allows your audience to absorb your information.Avoid rushing through your speech.
- Effective Pausing:Use strategic pauses to emphasize key points,allow for audience comprehension,and build anticipation.
- Dynamic Delivery:Vary your vocal volume and pitch to engage your audience and add emotion to your message.
Flow and Engagement:
- Smooth Transitions:Connect your ideas thoughtfully using effective transitions like rephrasing,signposting,and summarizing.
- Confident Presence:Maintain good eye contact with your audience and project your voice clearly.
- Enthusiasm and Passion:Show genuine interest in your topic and connect with your audience on an emotional level.
Additional Notes:
- Enjoy the Experience:Have fun delivering your speech!Your enthusiasm will be contagious and make your presentation more impactful.
- Learning Journey:Remember,everyone makes mistakes.View your speeches as opportunities to learn,grow,and improve your communication skills.
Feel free to ask me any questions before you begin. I'm here to support you and witness your learning journey!
Jim Chang
Clean Judges
None
Weiche chang
Clean Judges
None
Peter Chao
Leland High School
None
Shailu Chauhan
Clean Judges
None
Prathima CHAWLA
Leland High School
None
Shilpa Chen
Clean Judges
None
Maria (Tess) Chin
Bellarmine College Preparatory
None
Julie Chin Quee
Clean Judges
None
Wincy Chong
Leland High School
None
Vivek Chopra
Clean Judges
None
Last changed on
Thu January 11, 2024 at 11:13 AM PDT
I am parent judge participating in judging for the first year. I appreciate reasonably paced speaking, using diverse sources, eye contact and being natural.
Do not be rude, be assertive but not aggressive, respect your opponents. I value clear and concise arguments backed with strong evidence.
Chien-Shun Chu
Clean Judges
None
Samantha Chu
Leland High School
None
Erica Covarrubias
Clean Judges
None
Mariel Cruz
Notre Dame San Jose
Last changed on
Sat January 20, 2024 at 9:07 AM PDT
Mariel Cruz - Updated 1/3/2024
Schools I've coached/judged for: Santa Clara University, Cal Lutheran University, Gunn High School, Polytechnic School, Saratoga High School, and Notre Dame High School
I've judged most debate events pretty frequently, except for Policy and Congress. However, I was a policy debater in college, so I'm still familiar with that event. I mostly judge PF and traditional LD, occasionally circuit LD. I judge all events pretty similarly, but I do have a few specific notes about Parli debate listed below.
Background: I was a policy debater for Santa Clara University for 5 years. I also helped run/coach the SCU parliamentary team, so I know a lot about both styles of debate. I've been coaching and judging on the high school and college circuit since 2012, so I have seen a lot of rounds. I teach/coach pretty much every event, including LD and PF.
Policy topic: I haven’t done much research on either the college or high school policy topic, so be sure to explain everything pretty clearly.
Speed: I’m good with speed, but be clear. I don't love speed, but I tolerate it. If you are going to be fast, I need a speech doc for every speech with every argument, including analytics or non-carded arguments. If I'm not actively flowing, ie typing or writing notes, you're probably too fast.
As I've started coaching events that don't utilize speed, I've come to appreciate rounds that are a bit slower. I used to judge and debate in fast rounds in policy, but fast rounds in other debate events are very different, so fast debaters should be careful, especially when running theory and reading plan/cp texts. If you’re running theory, try to slow down a bit so I can flow everything really well. Or give me a copy of your alt text/Cp text. Also, be sure to sign-post, especially if you're going fast, otherwise it gets too hard to flow. I actually think parli (and all events other than policy) is better when it's not super fast. Without the evidence and length of speeches of policy, speed is not always useful or productive for other debate formats. If I'm judging you, it's ok be fast, but I'd prefer if you took it down a notch, and just didn't go at your highest or fastest speed.
K: I like all types of arguments, disads, kritiks, theory, whatever you like. I like Ks but I’m not an avid reader of literature, so you’ll have to make clear explanations, especially when it comes to the alt. Even though the politics DA was my favorite, I did run quite a few Ks when I was a debater. However, I don't work with Ks as much as I used to (I coach many students who debate at local tournaments only, where Ks are not as common), so I'm not super familiar with every K, but I've seen enough Ks that I have probably seen something similar to what you're running. Just make sure everything is explained well enough. If you run a K I haven't seen before, I'll compare it to something I have seen. I am not a huge fan of Ks like Nietzche, and I'm skeptical of alternatives that only reject the aff. I don't like voting for Ks that have shakey alt solvency or unclear frameworks or roles of the ballot.
Framework and Theory: I tend to think that the aff should defend a plan and the resolution and affirm something (since they are called the affirmative team), but if you think otherwise, be sure to explain why you it’s necessary not to. I’ll side with you if necessary. I usually side with reasonability for T, and condo good, but there are many exceptions to this (especially for parli - see below). I'll vote on theory and T if I have to. However, I'm very skeptical of theory arguments that seem frivolous and unhelpful (ie Funding spec, aspec, etc). Also, I'm not a fan of disclosure theory. Many of my students compete in circuits where disclosure is not a common practice, so it's hard for me to evaluate disclosure theory.
Basically, I prefer theory arguments that can point to actual in round abuse, versus theory args that just try to establish community norms. Since all tournaments are different regionally and by circuit, using theory args to establish norms feels too punitive to me. However, I know some theory is important, so if you can point to in round abuse, I'll still consider your argument.
Parli specific: Since the structure for parli is a little different, I don't have as a high of a threshold for theory and T as I do when I judge policy or LD, which means I am more likely to vote on theory and T in parli rounds than in other debate rounds. This doesn't mean I'll vote on it every time, but I think these types of arguments are a little more important in parli, especially for topics that are kinda vague and open to interpretation. I also think Condo is more abusive in parli than other events, so I'm more sympathetic to Condo bad args in parli than in other events I judge.
Policy/LD/PF prep:I don’t time exchanging evidence, but don’t abuse that time. Please be courteous and as timely as possible.
General debate stuff: I was a bigger fan of CPs and disads, but my debate partner loved theory and Ks, so I'm familiar with pretty much everything. I like looking at the big picture as much as the line by line. Frankly, I think the big picture is more important, so things like impact analysis and comparative analysis are important.
Xiaoming Cui
Monta Vista High School
None
Ting Dai
Valley Christian High School
None
Aaron Dailey
Leland High School
None
Pauline Daniels
Leland High School
None
Max Das
Leland High School
Last changed on
Sat January 20, 2024 at 5:18 AM PDT
Veritas et brevitas.
kiran dasoju
Clean Judges
None
Galen Davis
Fremont High School
None
Rubina Dbritto
Cupertino High School
None
Prachi Deodhar
Monta Vista High School
None
Satish Deshmukh
Clean Judges
Last changed on
Sat January 13, 2024 at 5:43 AM EDT
I am a parent judge and judging for past two and half year.
I prefer if both teams would reference their evidence and make their arguments concise and easy to understand.
Poornima Dhadesugur
Clean Judges
None
Ritesh Dhandha
Leland High School
None
Pranav Dharwadkar
Saratoga HS
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 12:17 AM PDT
I am a parent judge (read Lay Judge :-)
My paradigm is
- Clear and Slow in both Speech and Debate, so that it is easy for me to understand
- Structured presentation, demonstrating clarity of thought, so that I can follow your contentions and speech
- Robust roadmap, so that I know what you are going to tell me
- Logical flow of thoughts that tie back to your thesis and roadmap ensuring I am not lost
- I am analytical and critical, so not easily swayed by tangential statistics and overload of references that don't support your contention. I am looking for examples that support your argument and thesis.
- I am a parent judge, so my feedback is geared completely at making you better.
- Most importantly, all contestants are typically so good, it is extremely difficult to pick the top 3-5 places, there are usually very minor nits that differentiate. A contestant ranked fifth is almost as good, if not the same, as contestant ranked first. While this is not fair to the contestants, the reality is that I am forced to pick 1st to 5th place and sometimes very minor nits force my hand. So please don't be discouraged.
Good luck. Remember, you are all amazing. I applaud you on choosing to spend your fun childhood years on rigorous and tough extra curricular activities, like Speech and Debate competitions, instead of random texting. You are all winners in my book, just for making this difficult choice.
Padma Divakaruni
Evergreen Valley
None
Last changed on
Fri April 19, 2024 at 10:07 AM PDT
I look for consistency in the arguments throughout the debate
Judgement is limited only to the arguments presented and contested in the debate
Yufang Duan
Leland High School
None
Kamal Duggireddy
Cupertino High School
None
Esra Dumanli
Palo Alto High School
None
Pranoop Erasani
Clean Judges
None
Evan Esau
Valley Christian High School
None
Anthony Fangonilo
Valley Christian High School
None
Wei-chen Feng
Clean Judges
Last changed on
Thu January 25, 2024 at 12:09 PM PDT
Hi, I am a parent judge and my child competes in PF debates. I prefer less debate jargon and more emphasis on clearly explained points. I value ideas over aggressive presentations.
Roxana Flacau
Leland High School
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 12:00 AM PDT
Parent judge in 5th year of judging. Has judged almost entirely LD, with a 1-2 PF and Policy rounds as well.
Argumentation:
Truth > tech. I prefer realistic, well-warranted impacts over blippy extinction link chains. If I don't buy it, I won't vote on it. Avoid Ks, T, and all other "circuit" debate argumentation, I will not know how to evaluate them.
Logical responses are also important to me - if something your opponent says is simply illogical or contradictory, call them out on this, even if their argument is warranted. It shows that you are able to think critically and not just regurgitate evidence.
Evidence quality is very important to me. Please provide full author citations. Smith 19 doesn't tell me anything - Smith could be your neighbour for all I know. I love to see comparison and indicting of evidence as it shows me that you are well prepared and know the topic literature.
Speaking/round etiquette:
Please do not speak too fast and sign post clearly. I am flowing and will evaluate on argumentation, but if I cannot understand what you are saying I cannot flow or vote on it.
Please be respectful in round. It makes for a good debate experience for both the debaters and the judge. Speaks WILL be docked for rudeness.
Mahalakshmi Gandhi
Monta Vista High School
None
Sreeram Gandikota
Leland High School
None
Haripriyaa Ganesan
Leland High School
None
Kalpana Ganesan
Leland High School
None
Meenal Garg
Presentation High School
None
Hilda George
Clean Judges
None
Janakiraman Gopalan
Clean Judges
Last changed on
Wed April 24, 2024 at 3:38 AM PDT
I have been judging speech and debate for couple of years. I love to hear good debates with good use of language and arguments related to the topic. I take copious notes. My expectations is that the debaters will have mutual respect for one another.
At the end of the debate we all should leave the debate learning and gaining something new from one another.
Manoj Gopalasetty
Monta Vista High School
None
Jayesh Govindarajan
Gunn Sr High School
None
John Griffin
Bellarmine College Preparatory
None
Meenakshi Gulrajani
Monta Vista High School
None
Ethan Guo
BASIS Silicon Valley
None
Vikash Gupta
Clean Judges
None
Kevin Haas
Clean Judges
None
Arwa Haddad
Leland High School
None
Sungwook Han
Clean Judges
None
Prasann Handigund
Clean Judges
None
Avinash Harsh
Leland High School
None
Bharti Hathalia
Clean Judges
Last changed on
Fri January 12, 2024 at 11:37 PM PDT
Please do not spread and speak clearly. During cross fire, please ensure you are sticking to the topic and/or the argument brought up. Provide evidence. Be respectful to your opponents
Geoff Heredia
Christopher High School
None
Sudhir Hirudayaraj
Archbishop Mitty
None
Johnson Hormoz
Valley Christian High School
None
Jim Horng
Leland High School
None
John HUANG
Clean Judges
None
Simon Huang
Leland High School
Last changed on
Sat January 13, 2024 at 5:03 AM EDT
Hi I am a lay judge and English is my second language, so please speak a little bit slowly and please speak in plain English.
Vincent Huang
Bellarmine College Preparatory
Last changed on
Fri January 12, 2024 at 2:51 PM PDT
I am a parent judge and this is my 4th year judging debate and speech tournaments.
For debate-
My vote is based on the following three principles:
- Clarity and evidence: Debaters should deliver their arguments clearly and concisely, with supporting evidence from credible sources. Take your time to explain your reasoning to the judges, and don't assume that they will understand your points without a thorough explanation.
- Rebuttal: Debaters should challenge their opponents' arguments during cross-examination and rebuttal. This shows that you have listened carefully to your opponents and that you have thought critically about their arguments. Be sure to provide evidence to support your own arguments and to refute your opponents' claims.
- Pace: Debaters should speak at a moderate pace. Speaking too quickly can make it difficult for the judges to follow your arguments, while speaking too slowly can be boring and ineffective.
In addition to these three principles, I also appreciate it when debaters are respectful of their opponents and the judges.
For speech-
I am looking for presentations, not just readings. I appreciate speakers who use nonverbal communication skills such as varying their volume and speed, using hand gestures and facial expressions, and moving around the stage to engage the audience and emphasize key messages.
PS. Please avoid mumbling your words even if that could be funny to get certain effect.
I wish all people good luck and can enjoy the game.
Xiaofei Huang
Monta Vista High School
None
Sadanand Hullur
Saint Francis High School
None
Rajkumar Irudayaraj
Clean Judges
None
Shruti Iyengar
Bellarmine College Preparatory
Last changed on
Fri January 12, 2024 at 11:54 PM PDT
I am a lay judge but I have 8 years experience judging League debates.
General Stuff:
Just speak at conversational pace and tone and use all your time.
Only go for topicality if its a glaring violation
Try to avoid using terminology-heavy debates.
If aff, focus on defending your policies and answer all of the negs points effectively and clearly
If neg, focus on finding gaps in the policy proposal and carry only the most contested and strongest negative stock issues into the 2NR.
Cross ex is the most important focus area for me in the debate.This is the only part of debate where neg/aff actively clash with each other. I look for teams to use the that time effectively.Don't cut off responses, unless they are stretching the time limit.
Don't give up in round, I keep an open mind throughout the debate, even the last speech.
Jaison Jacob
Clean Judges
None
Bharat Jagani
Presentation High School
None
Chuck Jagannadhan
Clean Judges
None
Last changed on
Sat January 20, 2024 at 11:51 PM PDT
I am a parent judge. I've judged mainly lay Policy for the last 3 1/2 years. I prefer usage of stock issues. Please do not spread or read Ks with me.
Preeti Jain
Saratoga HS
None
Sanjay Jain
Presentation High School
None
Sachin Jaiswal
Clean Judges
None
Yogini Jamdar
Clean Judges
Last changed on
Sat January 27, 2024 at 1:44 PM PDT
I am a parent judge.
Please be professional and respectful of everyone in the room. I will judge a topic based on your power of persuasion and not my personal beliefs.
For PF: Speed is not an issue, as long as you are clear and logical in your reasoning and arguments (ideally <225 wpm). State evidence to connect your arguments while offering practical solutions. I would like to see good team balance. I flow the round, and I will disregard any new arguments in your summaries or final focus. If something is conceded in cross, it must be brought up again in a speech for it to affect the ballot.
Please clearly weigh to make my judging easier.
If you plan to spread, I would like to have a copy of the speech so I can follow along more easily.
Please manage the length of your speech, I will allow a maximum of 15 second grace period before it starts to detrimentally impact your points.
For Speech: I will be looking for cutting, delivery and context. Manage your vocal variety, volume and diction while also trying to portray the mood of the speech well.
Most importantly, I am just as excited to be here. So don’t forget to breathe and have fun!
Haiwen Jiang
Leland High School
None
Tresa Johnson
Clean Judges
None
Anjaly Joseph
Clean Judges
None
Sunita Joshi
Clean Judges
None
Sky Juinio
The Nueva School
Last changed on
Thu July 11, 2024 at 1:35 AM PDT
hi! i'm sky.
please strike me if i've coached you before. i've marked many of you as conflicts, but it is impossible to get all of you when you attend multiple schools, debate academies, etc. i'll always report conflicts to tabroom.
email is spjuinio@gmail.com. add me to the email chain.
please try to have pre-flows done before the round for the sake of time. i like starting early or on time.
tech over truth. i don't intervene, so everything you say is all i will evaluate. be explicit; explain and contextualize your arguments. try not to rely too much on jargon. if you do use jargon, use it correctly. extend evidence properly and make sure that your cards are all cut correctly. tell a thoughtful and thorough story that follows a logical order (i.e. how do you get from point A to point E? why should i care about anything you are telling me? i should know the answers to these questions by the end of your speeches). pursue the points you are winning and explain why you are winning the round. remind me how you access your impacts and do NOT forget to weigh. giving me the order in which i should prioritize the arguments read in round is helpful (generally, this is the case for judge instructions). sounding great will earn you high speaks, but my ballot will ultimately go to those who did the better debating.
read any argument you want, wear whatever you want, and be as assertive as you want. any speed is fine as long as you are clear. i will yell "clear!" if you are not. my job is to listen to you and assess your argumentation, not just your presentation. i'm more than happy to listen to anything you run, so do what you do best and own it!
speeches get a 15-second grace period. i stop flowing after 15 seconds have passed.
don't be rude. don't lie, especially in the late debate.
rfds. i always try to give verbal rfds. if you're competing at a tournament where disclosure isn't allowed, i will still try to give you some feedback on your speeches so you can improve in your next round/competition. write down and/or type suggestions that you find helpful (this might help you flow better). feel free to ask me any questions regarding my feedback. i also accept emails and other online messages.
now, specifics!
topicality. it would behoove you to tell me which arguments should be debated and why your interpretation best facilitates that discussion. make sure your arguments are compatible with your interpretation. if you go for framework, give clear internal link explanations and consider having external impacts. explain why those impacts ought to be prioritized and win you the round.
theory. make it purposeful. tell me what competing interpretations and reasonability mean. i like nuanced analyses; provide real links, real interpretations, and real-world scenarios that bad norms generate. tell me to prioritize this over substance and explain why i should.
counter-plans. these can be fun. however, they should be legitimately competitive. give a clear plan text and take clever perms seriously. comparative solvency is also preferred. impact calculus is your friend.
disadvantages. crystallize! remember to weigh. your uniqueness and links also matter.
kritiques. i love these a lot. i enjoy the intellectual potential that kritiques offer. show me that you are genuine by committing to the literature you read and providing an anomalous approach against the aff. alternatives are important (though i have seen interesting alternatives to...alternatives. if you go down this route, you can try to convince me that your argument is functional without one. as with all arguments, explain your argument well, and i might vote for you). as aforementioned, tell me to prioritize your argument over substance and why.
cross. i listen, but i will not assess arguments made in crossfires unless you restate your points in a speech. try to use this time wisely.
evidence. again, please cut these correctly (refer to the NSDA evidence rules). i'll read your evidence at the end of the round if you ask me to, if your evidence sounds too good to be true, or if your evidence is essential to my decision in some fashion. however, this is not an excuse to be lazy! extend evidence that you want me to evaluate, or it flows as analysis. make sure to identify the card(s) correctly and elaborate on their significance. don't be afraid to compliment your card(s). consider using your evidence to enhance your narrative coherence.
public forum debaters should practice good partner coordination, especially during summary and final focus. consider taking prep before these speeches because what you read here can make or break your hard work. arguments and evidence mentioned in the final focus need to have been brought up in summary for me to evaluate it. i flow very well and will catch you if you read new arguments, new evidence, or shadow extensions (arguments read earlier in the round that were not read in summary). none of these arguments will be considered in my ballot, so please do not waste time on them. focus on the arguments you are winning and please weigh, meta-weigh, and crystallize!
tl;dr. show me where and why i should vote. thanks :)
you are all smart. remember to relax and have fun!
Praveen KAKADE
Saint Francis High School
None
Prashanth Kalluraya
Clean Judges
None
Sunil Kamath
Cupertino High School
None
Sreedhar Kamishetti
Fremont High School
None
Nancy Kang
Clean Judges
None
Pushkar Kapasi
Saratoga HS
None
Nonit Kapur
Saint Francis High School
None
Krishna Katta
Presentation High School
None
Jicksen Kattumattathil
Notre Dame San Jose
None
Nida Khan
Monta Vista High School
None
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 11:05 AM EDT
Be kind to your fellow participants.
Be respectful of each other, let others finish their sentence, and keep your time.
Be clear and enunciate well to make sure you can showcase the effort that went into building the great content you have prepared.
Good luck to everyone!
Amit Khetawat
Leland High School
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 12:04 AM PDT
Hello Debaters,
I am a parent judge and this is my second year judging debate tournaments. Please speak slowly and clearly. Please don't run too many technical arguments and keep track of your time. You should also assume that I have no prior knowledge of the topic or context for the discussion. I appreciate clear analysis of why you should win in the final rebuttals.
Good Luck to all the teams.
Cheers!
-Amit
Monita Khona
Notre Dame San Jose
None
Boon Khor
Leland High School
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 12:11 AM PDT
I judge debates based on the logic behind arguments and if your impacts are strong and make sense. I look for a clear presentation and will judge based on speaking abilities as well as arguments. I prefer moderate speaking pace so that arguments are better understood.
Ruchira Khuanmuang
Presentation High School
None
Jay Kidambi
Presentation High School
None
Ben Kim
Clean Judges
None
Daniel D. Kim
Clean Judges
None
Ki Yong Kim
Clean Judges
None
Mrinal Kochar
Clean Judges
None
Vijay Koduri
Fremont High School
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 12:12 AM PDT
Hi, I'm Vijay. Here are my preferences for the round:
- Clearly state your contentions
- Speak slowly
- No theory. I don't understand it.
Other than that, everything else is up to you. Have fun!
Sridevi Kolli
Clean Judges
None
Mary Kotturan
Clean Judges
None
murthy krishna
Clean Judges
Last changed on
Wed January 10, 2024 at 8:47 AM PDT
I am a lay parent judge who has judged PF, LD, and various speech events in the past two years. Please do not spread or speak at very fast speeds, speak clearly and slowly so I can catch everything. I can't evaluate any advanced argumentation/theory/Ks, so please avoid it.
Be respectful and have fun!
Anu Krishnamurthy
Monta Vista High School
None
Dhanalakshmi Krishnan
Clean Judges
None
Ashish Kulkarni
Clean Judges
None
Edgar Ladaga
Milpitas High School
None
Arpana Lahiri
Leland High School
Last changed on
Sat January 20, 2024 at 1:36 PM PDT
Please speak coherently. I will be looking for the most significant arguments and then logical responses. I look for good and thoughtful delivery.
Larry Lai
Clean Judges
None
Subbu Lakshmi
Bellarmine College Preparatory
Last changed on
Sat January 13, 2024 at 12:40 AM PDT
I’ve judged a few tournaments in the last two years, and I would consider myself to be a lay judge. I’m open to listening to any arguments that you want to run as long as they are clear, well warranted, and delivered clearly. I do flow in the round and do my best to vote off of the arguments that remain at the end of the round. I typically give high speaker points as long as you are clear and explain yourself well.
At the end of the day, debate is supposed to be fun and a learning experience, so please try to have fun in the round and be respectful of your opponents in the round.
Andrew Lee
Clean Judges
None
Chang Kyu Lee
Palo Alto High School
None
Hyunseok Lee
Clean Judges
None
Janis Lee
Leland High School
None
Jieun Lee
Clean Judges
None
Lifen Lee
Cupertino High School
None
Nanda Lekkelapudi
Clean Judges
None
Holiday Li
Leland High School
Last changed on
Fri January 19, 2024 at 11:46 PM PDT
As a novice parent judge, I would appreciate the debate teams speak with clarity and don't go too fast. I will focus on how the team advance the argument, discredit the opposition and manage the clash with confidence.
Jing Li
Valley Christian High School
None
Jun Li
Presentation High School
None
Kelvin Li
Fremont High School
None
Kevin Li
Clean Judges
None
Zhi Li
Valley Christian High School
Last changed on
Fri April 19, 2024 at 1:24 PM PDT
My vote belongs to the speaker who builds a bridge of logic and reasoning, leading me across it to their point of view. Show me the data, paint a vivid picture, and leave me convinced that your vision is the one worth pursuing.
I am lay judge, my vote goes to the speaker who can melt my defenses like butter on a hot pan. But if you're spitting out words like popcorn kernels in a microwave, I'll be reaching for the extinguisher, not the ballot:)
Please add me in the email chain: R40135@Gmail.com
Zhihua Li
Clean Judges
None
Lori Linnemeyer
Bellarmine College Preparatory
Last changed on
Wed January 10, 2024 at 12:41 AM PDT
Parent judge. Speak slowly and explain arguments simply and clearly.
David Liu
Palo Alto High School
None
huibo liu
Valley Christian High School
Last changed on
Sun February 4, 2024 at 12:15 PM EDT
I am Parent lay judge. English is not my first language so please speak at a slower pace. Make sure to have good logic and reasoning with lots of data and evidence.
Ron Liu
Leland High School
Last changed on
Fri January 26, 2024 at 11:46 AM PDT
Hello, I am a parent judge that has judged in several tournaments in the past.
When speaking:
I look for the speaker to be confident, but not condescending in any way. Please do not spread, I will not accept jargon. If I can't understand what you are saying, I will not be able to take notes. Please be respectful to your opponents at all times.
Argumentation:
I will evaluate arguments based on how clear and effective they are. I will not be persuaded by arguments that are not clearly backed up. I will be voting for the team with stronger arguments and impacts.
Theory:
Please do not introduce theory!
Plans:
Don't introduce any if you are a Public Forum Debater
Best of luck to everyone!
Last changed on
Mon April 22, 2024 at 8:47 AM PDT
lay
Simon Liu
Leland High School
Last changed on
Fri January 5, 2024 at 8:48 AM PDT
I am a parent judge but have judged for multiple years since 2016. I mostly judged PF but I also judged Congress and Parliamentary.
I am flay, meaning I take notes, but not in a flow style.
I like to focus on direct clashes and rebuttals of your opponent's arguments. Points need to be extended in every speech, and if one team brings up a point that is not extended, I will not consider it. It is also up to the opponent team to bring this to my attention.
I will always weigh impacts. I primarily weigh on the magnitude, but I will also consider timeframe and probability.
Do not spread. I want every speaker to give their speeches in a clear, systematic way and emphasize the main points they want to resonate with me.
Ying Liu
Clean Judges
None
Adnaan Lokhandwala
Clean Judges
None
Grace Lum
Milpitas High School
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 12:34 AM PDT
I have been judging LD and PF debates for about 6 years. I do flow cases so it will be great if you could provide me with an off-time roadmap and signpost your arguments. I judge based on tech>truth.
It is important to have a clear framework, so make sure that you state that this is contention 1, subpoint 1 etc. Please extend your arguments and make sure that you have cards for your evidence since I do read them. I like clash so you have to defend your contentions during cross examination.
Please be respectful to your opponent during cross examination. Do let your opponent finish their question or sentence. I will sign my ballot the second that I hear any discriminatory language.
Have fun, do your best and good luck!
Erin Luo
Leland High School
None
Ping Luo
Bellarmine College Preparatory
Last changed on
Fri January 5, 2024 at 5:30 AM EDT
I founded Able2Shine, a public speaking company. And I have only judged a few debates this year but love the activity. And I want a clear communication round with no speed.
Last changed on
Fri April 26, 2024 at 6:18 AM PDT
I primarily judged speech events and coached limited prep speech for some students.
My judging criteria for extemp:
Content:
Analysis: Does the speech demonstrate a clear understanding of the issue and its complexities? Does it go beyond simply summarizing the news?
Argumentation: Does the speech present a well-defined central thesis? Are there strong supporting arguments with evidence?
Source Consideration: Does the speaker utilize a variety of credible sources to support their claims?
Transitions: Does the speaker give a transition between points?
Delivery:
Voice: Is the speaker's voice clear, audible, and varied in pitch and pace?
Articulation: Does the speaker enunciate words clearly and avoid filler words ("um," "like")?
Stage Presence: Does the speaker exhibit good posture, eye contact, and use of gestures to engage the audience?
Time Management: Does the speech stay within the allotted time limit?
Mary Ma
Clean Judges
None
Mark Mabie
The Nueva School
Last changed on
Thu January 18, 2024 at 11:28 AM PDT
TLDR; I debated parli in high school for 3 years and have been coaching PF, LD, and Parli for the last 9 years since then with state and national champions. I try do be as tabula rasa as possible. Refer to specifics below
Follow the NSDA debate rules for properly formatting your evidence for PF and LD.
If paraphrasing is used in a debate, the debater will be held to the same standard of citation and accuracy as if the entire text of the evidence were read for the purpose of distinguishing between which parts of each piece of evidence are and are not read in a particular round. In all debate events, The written text must be marked to clearly indicate the portions read or paraphrased in the debate. If a student paraphrases from a book, study, or any other source, the specific lines or section from which the paraphrase is taken must be highlighted or otherwise formatted for identification in the round
IMPORTANT REMINDER FOR PF: Burden of proof is on the side which proposes a change. I presume the side of the status quo. The minimum threshold needed for me to evaluate an argument is
1) A terminalized and quantifiable impact
2) A measurable or direct cause and effect from the internal link
3) A topical external link
4) Uniqueness
If you do not have all of these things, you have an incomplete and unproven argument. Voting on incomplete or unproven arguments demands judge intervention. If you don't know what these things mean ask.
Philosophy of Debate:
Debate is an activity to show off the intelligence, hard work, and creativity of students with the ultimate goal of promoting education, sportsmanship, and personal advocacy. Each side in the round must demonstrate why they are the better debater, and thus, why they should receive my vote. This entails all aspects of debate including speaking ability, case rhetoric, in-and-out-of round decorum, and most importantly the overall argumentation of each speaker. Also, remember to have fun too.
I am practically a Tabula Rasa judge. “Tab” judges claim to begin the debate with no assumptions on what is proper to vote on. "Tab" judges expect teams to show why arguments should be voted on, instead of assuming a certain paradigm. Although I will default all theory to upholding education unless otherwise told
Judge preferences: When reading a constructive case or rebutting on the flow, debaters should signpost every argument and every response. You should have voter issues in your last speech. Make my job as a judge easier by telling me verbatim, why I should vote for you.
Depending on the burdens implied within the resolution, I will default neg if I have nothing to vote on. (presumption)
Kritiks. I believe a “K” is an important tool that debater’s should have within their power to use when it is deemed necessary. That being said, I would strongly suggest that you not throw a “K” in a round simply because you think it’s the best way to win the round. It should be used with meaning and genuinity to fight actually oppressive, misogynistic, dehumanizing, and explicitly exploitative arguments made by your opponents. When reading a "K" it will be more beneficial for you to slow down and explain its content rather than read faster to get more lines off. It's pretty crucial that I actually understand what I'm voting on if It's something you're telling me "I'm morally obligated to do." I am open to hearing K's but it has been a year since I judged one so I would be a little rusty.
Most Ks I vote on do a really good job of explaining how their solvency actually changes things outside of the debate space. At the point where you can’t or don't explain how voting on the K makes a tangible difference in the world, there really isn't a difference between pre and post fiat impacts. I implore you to take note of this when running or defending against a K.
Theory is fine. It should have a proper shell and is read intelligibly. Even if no shell is present I may still vote on it.
Speed is generally fine. I am not great with spreading though. If your opponents say “slow down” you probably should. If I can’t understand you I will raise my hands and not attempt to flow.
I will only agree to 30 speaker point theory if it’s warranted with a reason for norms of abuse that is applicable to the debaters in the round. I will not extend it automatically to everyone just because you all agree to it.
Parli specifics:
I give almost no credence on whether or not your warrants or arguments are backed by “cited” evidence. Since this is parliamentary debate, I will most certainly will not be fact-checking in or after round. Do not argue that your opponents do not have evidence, or any argument in this nature because it would be impossible for them to prove anything in this debate.
Due to the nature of parli, to me the judge has an implicit role in the engagement of truth testing in the debate round. Because each side’s warrants are not backed by a hard cited piece of evidence, the realism or actual truth in those arguments must be not only weighed and investigated by the debaters but also the judge. The goal, however, is to reduce the amount of truth testing the judge must do on each side's arguments. The more terminalization, explanation, and warranting each side does, the less intervention the judge might need to do. For example if the negative says our argument is true because the moon is made of cheese and the affirmative says no it's made of space dust and it makes our argument right. I obviously will truth test this argument and not accept the warrant that the moon is made of cheese.
Tag teaming is ok but the person speaking must say the words themself if I am going to flow it. It also hurts speaker points.
Public Forum specifics:
I have no requirement for a 2-2 split. Take whatever rebuttal strategy you think will maximize your chance of winning. However note that offense generated from contentions in your case must be extended in second rebuttal or they are considered dropped. Same goes for first summary.
I will not accept any K in Public Forum. Theory may still be run. Critical impacts and meta weighing is fine. No pre-fiat impacts.
Your offense must be extended through each speech in the debate round for me to vote on it in your final focus. If you forget to extend offense in second rebuttal or in summary, then I will also not allow it in final focus. This means you must ALWAYS extend your own impact cards in second rebuttal and first summary if you want to go for them.
Having voter issues in final focus is one of the easiest ways you can win the round. Tell me verbatim why winning the arguments on the flow means you win the round. Relate it back to the standard.
Lincoln Douglass and Policy:
I am an experienced circuit parliamentary debate coach and am very tabula rasa so basically almost any argument you want to go for is fine. Please note the rest of my paradigm for specifics. If you are going to spread you must flash me everything going to be read.
Email is Markmabie20@gmail.com
Ritika Maheshwari
Clean Judges
None
Lynbrook-Pratibha Mangla
Lynbrook HS
None
Somnath Mani
Valley Christian High School
Last changed on
Sat January 20, 2024 at 11:53 PM PDT
I am a completely Lay judge with no circuit judging experience. If you want to debate circuit, please add me to the email chain so I can read your case and try to follow along (somnath.mani@gmail.com)
For both Lay and Circuit, please make your impacts clear and exactly why I should be voting for the affirmative /negation. I am not great with speed so I prefer if you talk slower.
Ramesh Manian
Clean Judges
None
Tomas Margain
Mountain View High School
None
Erin Matheson Ritchie
San Lorenzo Valley High School
Last changed on
Fri April 12, 2024 at 9:44 AM PDT
Background: I primarily did PF in high school (as well as other speech events + Congress). Currently I'm a speech + debate coach. 3x National qualifier.
In all forms of debate, I prioritize clash and impact weighing. Tell me where to vote on the flow. Tell me how you've won your debate.
Parli: I love a good k. I dislike friv theory as it wastes time and contradicts the purpose of debate (education).
PF: Cards without valid reasoning to demonstrate how they support your argument do not prove your point. Please signpost, warrant, and weigh.
LD: I prefer a traditional approach to LD. Set up a framework that explains how your value weighs more or solves for your opponent's case. Use the framework as you weigh voters. Prioritize quality over quantity when it comes to words/speed. LD shouldn't be treated like circuit policy.
Policy: I do my best to keep up with speed, although I'm less familiar flowing policy than other debate formats. I'll consider kritiks, counterplans, and disadvantages.
Speech: I vote based on emotional authenticity, delivery, content (topic, speech cutting), organization, and blocking. I care about unique topics in platform events and believable acting + compelling character arcs in interp.
Decorum: To me, debate should be inclusive and welcoming to students of all identities and experience levels. If you make it hostile for someone, I cannot ethically vote for you, no matter the flow. Laughing at your opponents; excessively whispering during others' speeches; or making implicitly sexist, racist, or ableist arguments will affect your speaks and my ability to buy your argument. I will deduct speaker points if I encounter students from the same program running the same arguments word-for-word. Share ideas in prepared debate events, but write your own cases.
Parag Mehta
Leland High School
None
Rakesh Mehta
Clean Judges
None
Yamini Modukuru
Clean Judges
None
Hemalatha Mohanan
Clean Judges
None
Feroz Mohummed
Presentation High School
None
Kevin Morrow
Clean Judges
None
Benjamin Murillo
Leland High School
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 4:43 AM PDT
Benjamin M.
I take on my role as judge from an impartial view to whichever side of the topic a team has been assigned to but rather observant to how each team have embraced their side of the argument and the delivering of such in a clear, concise and convincing fashion.
I assimilate with much more ease facts and true figures rather than personal opinions or unprovable references. I also value beside s the delivery of the main argument the physical performance itself as connecting to audience, gestures, stance, speech speed, eye contact.
As tribute to the effort put in their preparation for the event, I dedicate my total and undivided attention to the speaker in order to absorb the performance in its entirety in order to make a fair and unbiased decision of the outcome.
Satish Musukula
Clean Judges
None
Gauri Nadkarni
Clean Judges
Last changed on
Wed January 10, 2024 at 10:07 AM PDT
I am a parent judge with some experience in judging but not with fast debate. Please avoid using terms that parents do not understand.
For Policy Debate specifically, I evaluate the round based on the clarity of your point, evidence, and ability to handle cross-examination of issues. I will consider your framing but will vote for a more credible, logical, and understandable case most of the time. I also prefer summarizing your argument and points at the end of the debate, especially in rebuttals.
Rajeev Nagabhirava
Bellarmine College Preparatory
Last changed on
Sat January 13, 2024 at 12:29 AM PDT
I am a parent judge and I have been judging events for the last 2-3 years.
For congress debate tournaments:
I look for clarity, speaking to the point, using floor space, eye contact, respect to other members. If you spread, talk too fast, run through impact parts too fast, I won't be able to keep track and will ignore them.
I try to focus and listen the entire duration of your speech. I write my feedback simultaneously as I listen to the speech. I also listen carefully to cross examinations, and will take account of every time you make a good point or defend effectively. Use your cross examination time effectively, I won't reward when there is a stalemate.
My decision is based on: framework, arguments, reasoning, evidence... Focus on why your impacts are important why they are better than your opponent. It would be good if you start out with specifics and then at the end you summarize.
Tejinder Nahal
Clean Judges
None
Dooheui Nam
Los Altos High School
None
Kate Nam
Clean Judges
None
Anil Nanduri
Presentation High School
None
Amit Nangare
Valley Christian High School
None
Anna Nelson
Fremont High School
None
Rajasekar Nemani
Leland High School
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 5:17 AM PDT
As a debate judge, I am not worried about your presentational/speaking skills.
Hari Nidumolu
Clean Judges
None
shailesh niranjan
Clean Judges
Last changed on
Fri January 19, 2024 at 10:45 PM PDT
Hi,
I am a parent judge. I have some experience with judging LD
Please be respectful, stick to the facts, manage your time, and speak clearly.
Fewer well developed points is my preference
Julie Noh
Leland High School
Last changed on
Thu January 18, 2024 at 10:57 AM PDT
Julie Noh (she/her). I'm a parent judge. Please email me your evidence and include me on the email chain at julienoh@gmail.com
My paradigm for debate focuses on:
Clear and concise communication from the debaters. I'm looking for logical reasoning and evidence-based arguments and quality debate. I expect debaters to use credible sources and avoid making sweeping generalizations or unsupported claims. If you spread, make sure you can be understood!
Respectful discourse. Engage with your opponents' arguments in a respectful and constructive manner, rather than simply dismissing or ignoring them. Debaters should ask questions and seek clarification when necessary, and respond to their opponents' questions in a clear and straightforward manner.
Time management and organization. This is both in terms of structuring arguments and delivering speeches within the allotted time. Debaters should be well-prepared and have a clear understanding of the key issues at stake, impacts, as well as a clear plan for how to address them effectively.
I leave you with this haiku:
Speak with conviction
Evidence and reasoning
Challenge with respect
Leng Ooi
Leland High School
Last changed on
Wed January 17, 2024 at 6:16 AM PDT
I'm a parent judge and I like to listen to clear and concise proposals and rebuttals. I may not be familiar all the details of the policy judging will be purely based on details presented in the plan and counterplans. I look forward to being educated in policy details.
Speech is always about clarity and messaging. The ability to captivate the audience and present the topic well is a plus.
Ramiel Oshana
Leland High School
None
Preeti Parasar
Cupertino High School
None
Sheetal Parasuraman
Leland High School
None
Hetal Patel
Leland High School
None
Madhura Patki
Valley Christian High School
None
Sruti Patnaik
Clean Judges
None
Monisha Perkash
Gunn Sr High School
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 5:15 AM PDT
I’m an inexperienced parent judge, so go slowly and please don’t use debate jargon. I’ll vote simply off of logical, well-defended arguments.
I’m going to emphasize the importance of going slowly. If you give me a four minute speech with a lot of really fast content, I will catch none of it and it would be a wasted four minutes. If you give me a slower, well explained speech, potentially with less content, I’ll be able to understand all of it and your 4 minutes will have been used very effectively.
Be respectful, present your side well, and have fun!
Sameer Phadke
Bellarmine College Preparatory
None
Indrani Pillutla
Presentation High School
None
ASHIS PODDAR
Clean Judges
None
mayank Pradhan
Archbishop Mitty
None
Jay Purushothaman
Monta Vista High School
None
Last changed on
Fri January 12, 2024 at 10:07 AM PDT
Parent judge, please try to go slower and err on the side of overexplaining jargon on the topic. Warrant out and impact all of your arguments. Good reasoning and explaining of your side will win you the round.
George Raine
Mountain View High School
None
Tasneem Raja
Washington High School
None
Krithika Rajagopalan
Notre Dame San Jose
None
Swaminathan Rajagopalan
Palo Alto High School
None
Arathy Ramanujam
Bellarmine College Preparatory
None
Manish Ranjan
Clean Judges
None
Last changed on
Thu May 23, 2024 at 3:34 AM PDT
From San Jose CA. My son is active in debate and I've judged speech and debate competitions for ~6 years.
Speed- I prefer elucidation and clarity to speed.
I like fewer more well developed points versus lots of varied but weaker arguments.
I dislike rude behavior, verbal or through gestures.
I really enjoy the creativity that teams bring to their debate topics and the diligence they bring to the preparation.
Ranjani Rao
Monta Vista High School
None
Benzila Rappai
Clean Judges
None
Last changed on
Sat January 20, 2024 at 11:58 PM PDT
Exposed to a lot of expository speaking in my professional career working with some remarkable speakers. I care about the overall presence of the contestant along with the overall structure of their piece and I appreciate speeches that are delivered with confidence and enthusiasm!
I like to take specific notes around the overall speech structure and delivery, and share feedback in the ballot.
Rodrigo Rodriguez
Christopher High School
None
Hongbo Rong
Evergreen Valley
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 12:27 AM PDT
I am a parent judge. Please speak clearly so I may best understand all your arguments. Place importance on rebuttals and empirical evidence in debate. Also place importance on logic.
Rajesh Rudraradhya
Los Altos High School
None
Celina Ryan
Bellarmine College Preparatory
Last changed on
Wed January 10, 2024 at 8:26 AM PDT
I am a parent judge, do not spread. Present yourself confidently and be organized. Don't interrupt each other in cross-examination.
Tasneem Sabri
Rise Academy
None
Arzu Saglam
Clean Judges
None
Ganapathy Sankar
Leland High School
Last changed on
Sat January 20, 2024 at 11:57 PM PDT
Parent Judge:
Don't spread, make sure to make your arguments clear.
All responses to constructive must be in rebuttal. If an argument is not extended through FF & Summary, then it won't count. Make sure to frontline your defense against the opponents through all speeches as well.
Sign post
ganu.sankar@gmail.com -- add to the email chain
Kumar Sankaran
Clean Judges
None
Shital Sarvakar
Mission San Jose High School
Last changed on
Thu January 4, 2024 at 5:45 PM EDT
I am Parent Judge and I have experience in judging LD and PF for about 3 years. I like crisp and clear speaking during debate. Fast or slow does not matter as long as I can understand. I prefer to listen to actual facts rather than just theory. Please be respectful of your opponents. Off-time roadmaps helps me while judging and I believe will help the candidates also from speaker point of view.
Please introduce yourself and introduce topic in 1-2 sentence .
Arguments- Back them up with good evidence, data , analysis.
Cross fire- Be respectful and stick to the points
Speaker points - Clear concise with moderate pace speaking , good performance in crossfire will get highest speaker points.
Enjoy debate and have fun.
Please reach out to me if you have any questions.
Chris Schuetz
Cupertino High School
Last changed on
Sat January 20, 2024 at 11:53 PM PDT
I am new to judging, but participated in competitive speaking as a high school student.
I expect competitors to:
Show good sportsmanship
Be respectful of each other and the organizing staff
Engage in behavior at the event that fosters an inclusive environment
Brennan Scott
Clean Judges
None
Prakash Sethia
Mission San Jose High School
Last changed on
Fri February 9, 2024 at 11:26 PM PDT
Hi Everyone. I am an experienced parent judge, and know how to take general notes and as long as you send a doc, that is well formatted, you can probably get away with talking a little faster. As for my general preferences.
1. YOU ARE IN A LAY ROUND! Thus I expect you to utilize delivery and external persuasive techniques. The winner isn't who can win the most arguments, its the one who wins the most impactful argument and can present it in a way that shows its impact. Thus not only explaining what the voters are, but why those must be the voter is very important.
2. CX is very important. This is the only time in the debate round where you can directly engage with you opponent, so use it. This is the time you show me how your opponent doesn't know what they are talking about, by asking strategic questions and replying strategically. Considering all this, it is never okay to be rude to your opponent or to make your opponent feel uncomfortable.
3. Delivery. Like I said you can go slightly faster (not spreading), as long as you are clear. Clarity is key. This is reflected not only in whether you stutter or not, but also word choice and being able to explain a concept in a way that is easy to understand.
These are my general preference, and should give you an idea of how you want to structure your speeches. Note I am taking notes, not flowing, thus it would be great if you guys could adapt to these criterions, cause otherwise the lense at which you look the round from may be different than how I look at the round.
Achyut Shah
Cupertino High School
None
Alpa Shah
Palo Alto High School
None
Ashish Shah
Presentation High School
None
Nandini Shah
Clean Judges
None
Neil Shah
Leland High School
None
Sandip Shah
Clean Judges
None
Vibhav Shah
Clean Judges
None
Junaith Shahabdeen
Presentation High School
None
Shirley Shan
Clean Judges
Last changed on
Fri January 19, 2024 at 11:59 PM PDT
I am a parent judge who has judged for about two years. I won't understand super fast talking of any kind, so I advise you to speak at a normal pace.
I will only vote based off what is said in the round, and will not make any assumptions myself. This means that you should assume that I know nothing about the topic, which is probably true. If you want me to consider an argument, I suggest you bring it up in the final speeches of the debate. This is mainly where I will make my decision, so I think clearly stating your reasons on why you won here is important.
Other than that, have fun.
Prakash Sharma
Clean Judges
Last changed on
Wed January 10, 2024 at 10:07 AM PDT
Please speak slow and be clear in analysis. 2nd year parent judge
Priyanka Sharma
Archbishop Mitty
Last changed on
Fri January 12, 2024 at 11:36 PM PDT
Newer parent judge, please speak slow.
Seema Sharma
Archbishop Mitty
None
Sushma Sheshadri
Bellarmine College Preparatory
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 12:29 AM PDT
I am very new to the world of debate. I would like to see clear argumentation with great delivery. Please don’t speak too fast while debating, as it becomes hard for us parent judges to understand. Extra points for strong rhetoric and good summaries of key arguments at the end. Be persuasive, but be respectful to your opponent. Please speak clearly. Best of luck to everyone!
Winnie Shin
Leland High School
None
Dmitry Shmidt
Fremont High School
None
Pragati Shrivastava
Leland High School
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 4:15 AM PDT
My preference is that the speakers should have a moderate pace in their speeches so that the judge could fully understand them and specifically when they are speaking about their contentions.
Be polite and respectful through the debate.
I request that both the parties could time each other while speaking and warn/alert if they are exceeding the given time limit
Deepinder Singh
Clean Judges
None
Mandeep Singh
Clean Judges
None
Sweta singh
Clean Judges
None
Abhishek Singhal
Palo Alto High School
None
Vinay Singla
Leland High School
None
Sameet Sinha
Clean Judges
None
Krisshnaveni Sivanesan
Presentation High School
None
Radha Sivaramakrishnan
Monta Vista High School
None
Becky Slama-Bennett
Clean Judges
None
Charles Son
Clean Judges
None
Andrea Soria
Clean Judges
None
Last changed on
Fri January 19, 2024 at 11:41 AM PDT
I did not participate in S&D in high school or undergraduate or graduate school.
I have been judging for about one year, so this Paradigm is a work in progress.
I am a Chemistry Professor. This leads me to analyze your presentation from a science and academic background (my viewpoint, not yours). You should explain your warrants and arguments clearly.
I would recommend going a bit slower, especially on theory arguments, if you want to make sure that I'm able to follow everything.
Radhika Sudharsan
Leland High School
None
Julia Sullivan
Clean Judges
None
Jennifer Sumant
Los Altos High School
None
Ishaq Syed
Clean Judges
None
Cerelia Tan
Clean Judges
None
Angela Tang
Valley Christian High School
None
Huibin Tang
Gunn Sr High School
None
Sivaranjani Tappita
Monta Vista High School
None
Ariadne Tcharos
Clean Judges
None
Shufang Tian
Clean Judges
None
Abhishek Tiwari
Clean Judges
None
Rakesh Tiwari
Clean Judges
None
Saeed Totonchi
Clean Judges
None
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 2:24 AM PDT
Do your best!!!
Terese Tricamo
Los Altos High School
None
chuong truong
Clean Judges
None
Kevin Tseng
Leland High School
Last changed on
Thu January 25, 2024 at 8:00 PM EDT
Truth > Tech
First and foremost, I am a lay parent judge. Please be patient and explain arguments thoroughly at a reasonable pace. I will not be familiar with the topic you are debating, and make sure to extend the argument throughout the entire debate. Also, be sure to provide an off-time road map and I also want to hear top-level reasons why you win today's debate. Racism, homophobia, sexism, or any other -ism will not be tolerated. Thank you!
Last changed on
Sun January 7, 2024 at 10:43 AM PDT
I am a parent judge.
Kazi Tulip
Leland High School
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 12:07 AM PDT
I am a PF lay judge. Few notes:
-State your points clearly and concisely with researched backup arguments, avoid jargon
-Make sure to cite your evidence
-Please be respectful of your opponents
-Make sure to time yourself
-Will provide written feedback after the round, no verbal feedback
All the best!
Shaila Vajirkar
Leland High School
None
Murthy Vakkalagadda
Bellarmine College Preparatory
Last changed on
Sat January 20, 2024 at 11:48 PM PDT
Hi! I am a parent judge. I look for someone who presents the case well, and knows what they are talking about.
Be nice and have fun!
Sheetal Vartak
Leland High School
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 10:46 AM EDT
Everyone has to be clear. I do not take notes so I am a typical lay judge. be nice to eachother.
Mohit Vaswani
Clean Judges
None
Last changed on
Sat January 13, 2024 at 2:51 AM PDT
I like to see structure - lay a roadmap and get into the speech.
Stay civil, polite and courteous throughout the round, despite how the round is going for your opponent.
I do not like rudeness or snide remarks, we are all trying to learn together.
Gopinath Vinodh
Clean Judges
Last changed on
Fri January 12, 2024 at 10:42 AM PDT
Teams must respectful of eachother.
Facts and evidence are the most important in a round.
Mahesh Vittal Viveganandhan
Clean Judges
None
Christopher Vu
Leland High School
None
Gagan Vyas
Milpitas High School
Last changed on
Wed January 24, 2024 at 10:05 AM PDT
flay judge.
Manisha Vyas
Milpitas High School
Last changed on
Fri January 26, 2024 at 4:11 AM PDT
flay, do what you will.
Amy Wang
Notre Dame San Jose
None
Shuyi Wang
Bellarmine College Preparatory
Last changed on
Wed June 19, 2024 at 9:01 AM PDT
Debate:
I am a newer/less experienced Debate judge and would appreciate debaters use traditional speaking speed.
Speech:
I have been judging speech events since 2017 and have coached students who focus in Original Oratory, Informative, and Impromptu. Prior to my U.S. high school speech judging experiences, I was professionally trained in pubic speaking in my native language; my career involves a high amount of marketing content development, corporate/executive communications, and public relations.
In speech writing, I look for a clear roadmap, strong arguments backed by research (I don't need to agree with your statistical findings or your conclusion, but your findings should fully support your viewpoints), and pragmatic solutions for issues you identified.
For interpretation events, especially those that compose of multiple literature works, I hope to not feel that the selections are pieced together. In other words, the structure should be logical, cohesive, and seamless.
For speech delivery, I look for genuine emotions that help me relate to the urgency of your topic: why is it important now and why your viewpoints, research, and life experiences are the right ones to help your audience understand it holistically. I also appreciate speakers who are able to present with their unique styles, even if there are parts where further polishing is needed.
Over the years I've heard a good number of strong speakers who sound just like Haris Hosseini or JJ Kapur in one of their NSDA speeches. While I admire these students' technical excellence, I also feel that their speeches inevitably become less personal and less distinctive in my ears. It's a fine balancing act between finding inspiration from great speakers/speeches and developing your unique voice.
Xiuzhong Wang
Clean Judges
Last changed on
Fri January 12, 2024 at 2:23 PM PDT
I have served as a judge for debate for four years and I prefer slower speech with proper short pauses.
For congressional debate, I would love to see new arguments that really advance the debate.
For speech, I prefer the structured approach with emphasis and rigor logic.
Last changed on
Sat January 20, 2024 at 5:17 AM PDT
Zita Wang
I am a parent judge. I judged speech and debate in different tournments in the past three years.
Take your pace, provide framework, and love to hear your summary about why you should win.
Be confident, run your flow, respect your competitors, and have fun!
Jeremy Werner
Clean Judges
None
Eric Wong
Clean Judges
None
Desmond Wright
Leland High School
None
Dongxiang Wu
Palo Alto High School
None
Joe Wu
Valley Christian High School
None
Lynbrook-Junqing Wu
Lynbrook HS
None
Wesley Wu
Valley Christian High School
None
Weiqi Xiao
Gunn Sr High School
None
Young Xie
Clean Judges
None
Tom Xiong
Cupertino High School
None
Ayane Yamaguchi
Clean Judges
None
Jason Yee
Valley Christian High School
None
Choon-Hoe Yeoh
Valley Christian High School
None
Lei Yin
Leland High School
None
Samreen Zafer
Leland High School
None
Houyou Zhang
Palo Alto High School
None
Liping Zhang
Valley Christian High School
None
Youwei Zhang
BASIS Silicon Valley
None
Li Zhou
Saint Francis High School
None
Pin Zhou
Leland High School
Last changed on
Sun January 21, 2024 at 4:51 AM PDT
I am a parent judge with some speech and debate judging experience. Please talk slowly and make your logic and argument clear.
Julia Zhu
Bellarmine College Preparatory
None
Qiming Zhu
Leland High School
None