I'm a tabula rasa judge and can be convinced to vote in whatever framework you argue IF (and this is a huge IF) you do the work to explain what your framework is, why it is the most important and how to interacts with the other teams.

If I'm not given a framework, I will default to a policy making paradigm with a prioritization on impact magnitude. I enjoy policy-focused rounds more than K-focused ones.

I debated in high school and college but it's been a minute so It'll take me a bit to get used to high flow rounds again - slowing down a bit will do you a ton of good.

The use of a speech drop and evidence sharing is NOT a substitute for quality, line-by-line. I do NOT want to read your cards - do the work to correctly argue your points and do comparison.

Hutchinson High School assistant coach for 2 years running.

Hutch alum 4 time state attendee 2 time nsda nats.

6 years debate experience, debater for Wichita State University.

https://www.wichita.edu/academics/fairmount_college_of_liberal_arts_and_sciences/elliott/2012/Student_Organizations/Debate_home.php

Just do what makes you happy. Debate is supposed to be fun and teach you new things. I like competitive debates where teams actually care and aren't just reading off the doc. I will be sure to give personal feedback to everyone on ballot and keep a neat flow. Ill go for any strat, weather you play safe and just go da or decide to spice it up and bring out a K is up to you and ill do my best to take in any argument. Don't change your style for me i'll adapt to whatever you throw at me. I do well with speed, not a fan of open crossx for highschoolers.

Please include me in email chains/ speech drop, 70% of you don't know how to sign post.

email: Kaydperd@gmail.com

Good luck to anyone who took the time to read :) <3

Honour Robinson (He/They)

I am a current 2-year debater at Manhattan Highschool. 

Prefers: I am a policy maker and prefer accurate, up-to date cards. I vote for whoever has the best outcome/scenario.  I have trouble hearing so being louder is needed, I flow (and hope you do too) so I can understand CLEAR/COHERENT spreading. 

I recommend an off-time roadmap, sign posting, and having a speech drop to follow in round. It's amazing to be flowing during round, helps you and me if it's a high-speed debate round. 

Topicality: Unless you have an extremely valid reason why you should win on topicality, I won't be voting for you. It's hard to win on topicality because of how vague the resolution can stretch to be, don't waste your time by trying to stretch it even farther with running topicality. 

DisAds: Make sure you clearly have your UQ, Link, Imp, ect. In my own opinions DAs are going to be the strongest in any debate, but pairing one with a good CP is very likely to win me over. 

Counterplan: My love, I truly love counterplans. They are like cheating in the best way. I think that it's easy to do a counterplan incorrectly, but when you do it correctly, they work wonderfully. I honestly prefer a counterplan whenever it fits. 

Kritiks: I do not like kritiks, i would recommend not to run them. 

I do not listen to any unneeded arguments, anything that hurts any community or misrepresents individuals. Homophobic/Racist/Sexist/Ableist ideology will immediately be voted down. 

If you are rude or mean in the round, you have immediately lost. I take negative out-of-round comments about teams as well. Just be nice, it's not that hard. 

If you have any questions, you can reach out to me at honourmrobinson@gmail.com