I use to consider myself a stock issues judge....But I'm slowly moving away from it I'm good with T as long as it's done right. I'm ok with K's and CP's, But I wouldn't bank on winning with that alone. Also I prefer closed CX...and I REALY prefer closed constructive and rebuttals. Spreading is fine as long as I can understand the tag lines.

Overall, I am a stock issues judge but I will flow anything. I do like theory arguments to an extent, but I can't and won't vote on anything without evidence. Speed is fine but I need to be able to understand your taglines. As far as impacts go, I really like seeing debaters connect the impacts to me and show me why I should care.