I like a nicely structured debate. Making the framework and definitions clear is important. However, I do not like for this to carry on. Make the structure clear and move on. You should not still be debating what the framework is in your last rebuttals.

I look for quality sources, not quantity

Debates that build off each other are the best. Don't debate at me, debate with your opponent.

I also look for speaking style. Since I am primarily a speech judge, I take speaking skills into account. Mumbling, speaking monotonously, over using hand movements, and stumbling will rank you lower.

Lastly, I just want the argument to make sense. Don't give me a convoluted, overly complex argument. Make it make sense.

I competed in Public Forum for 3/4 years in high school so I'm knowledgeable and the process and the ideas behind it.

I value responding to all the arguments the other team makes as well as debaters being cohesive and organized with their arguments in all the speeches they make. BE RESPECTFUL. If a team goes over their time limit or maybe makes new arguments when they shouldn't, don't shout out to make me aware as I'll be listening and will be sure to only take into account what I should. Otherwise, just be competitive, be confident, and make sure to enjoy the round.

As a parent judge with a reading background and experience in teaching at the University level, the judging criteria are:

• Team with the more persuasive case
• Clear communication
• Well-structured and organized
• Quality of argument over quantity
• Reasoning and evidence
• Listening and response

Debate away!