I prefer concise arguments with well-supported by evidence. I value the quality of the arguments rather than the quantity, and would like debaters to speak at a moderate pace. Please remember to have fun, and I am excited to hear your arguments!

Judge Paradigm for Wade Drummonds

Experience Level: I coached a high school debate club since 2021 and have judged two debates in the 2023-2024 school year. As a high school teacher, I integrate debate into my lessons, providing oral feedback to students. My direct experience in debate is limited to coaching and judging; I was not part of a debate club in high school or college.

Judging Philosophy: I value logical arguments supported by evidence and clear reasoning. My background emphasizes understanding diverse viewpoints, favoring arguments presented clearly and without excessive jargon.

Preferences:

• Rate of Delivery: A pace that ensures understanding of the arguments.
• Use of Jargon: Minimal use, focusing on clarity.
• Note-taking: I track arguments and evidence, emphasizing argument substance.
• Argument vs. Style: Substance over style, but clear and effective communication enhances the persuasiveness of arguments.
• Criteria for Assessment: I consider the strength of arguments, evidence presented, the relevance to the topic, and the ability to engage with the opposing side's points.
• In-Round Conduct: Expect respectful and civil engagement, with a focus on the quality of debate over theatrics.

Feedback: I aim to provide constructive feedback that encourages improvement and deeper understanding of the debated issues.

Professional Development: I seek insights from the debate community to enhance my judging capabilities.