I'm the head coach of the newly formed Oak Harbor HS Debate Team (WA).

I did a public forum debate in HS and College a very long time ago. I am not a traditionalist.

I appreciate sassy, aggressive debaters who enjoy what they do and I dislike mean, sullen students who use trickery. Know that an unpleasant attitude will damage your speaker points.

Generally,

Speed-speak clearly, I may struggle if you are fast and unclear. I won't tell you if you are unclear-I feel it is your job to adapt. Hint: If you don't see me writing/typing, you probably want to slow down.

Tech = truth: I am learning more tech but I do not vote for weak arguments that are blatantly untrue whether or not your opponent calls it out.

Arguments & votes:

I appreciate a strongly developed strategy with clear concise arguments that include compelling evidence coupled with strong analytical reasoning. I like to connect the dots.

I value arguments based on overall persuasiveness, clarity, and presentation.

Please be sure to explain terms you think might be new to a lay judge, so we are on the same page.

I keep personal beliefs and opinions out of judging with a focus on logical reasoning, evidence, and a civil debate.