i'm looking for an enthusiastic compelling multifaceted eloquent argument that displays critical thinking and very good listening skills.

parli debaters:

hi! my name is clara and i was a paril debater for 3 years in middle school, now im a policy debater at brooklyn tech. i think im a pretty easy person to please; just use up all your time, do NOT say anything offensive (racist, sexist, homophobic, classist etc.) your speaks will not look pretty (and neither will the rfd!) and speak clearly! in a parli round, i will value clarity over speed any day. no heckling during online tournaments, and be respectful with your pois (make sure they're a QUESTION, save your statements for your speech!).

first speaker:

i honestly can't say much about this speech, but try to be as CLEAR as possible. assume i know nothing about whatever your arguing for. all of your arguments should have a clear warrant, evidence and impact. please don't just evidence dump, EXPLAIN your evidence and always have your sources. i don't vote for teams with the most evidence, i vote for the team that best USES that evidence. if you have any questions abt that just lmk before the round starts

second speaker:

pretty important speech (also one of the harder ones imo). you should refute your opponents arguments and rebuild on your partners arguments. i think this is a really flexible speech, but as long as you do those two things i cant say much else! im a sucker for impact weighing, as i think thats really what the debate boils down to. make it clear to me that your impacts are greater than your opponents!

third speaker:

third speakers have a special place in my heart, as i was one. any new arguments in this speech WILL be disregarded. most of this speech should just be you telling me why i should vote for you and not the other team. make the debate clear to me, i can't and really don't want to make arguments for you. crystalize, weigh your impacts and summarize the debate. thats pretty much all i can say :)

My name is Ologunde Ajibola and I've been a debate for the past 3 years boasting a wide array of achievements and British parliamentary awards such as being the

2nd Best novice speaker Zadek 2.0

Finalist Novice category Zadek 2.0

Best speaker Pre-EVC 2023.

Finalist and 3rd best team pre-EvC BP open 2023

Finalist and 3rd best team EVC 6.0

7th best speaker EVC 6.0

I am also knowledgeable and skillful in judging various format of debates such as British parliamentary debate, Lincoln Douglas debate, PF, SPAR, IMPROMPTU e.t.c. Furthermore, I've adequately been certified on cultural competency test and I provide detailed RFD on performances within debate rounds.

Hello, my name is Ninon and I am a parent of students on the Ella Baker Debate Squad. Full disclosure, I have not competed in debate tournaments personally. But, I am a keen student and truly respect all the work that goes into crafting and delivering persuasive arguments.

In general, I encourage you to focus more on improving your performance from the last round or last tournament than winning and beating your opponents.

I value clear, well-structured arguments supported by evidence and developed over your team's speeches (i.e., extensions).

I find it persuasive when a team responds directly to the opponent's weighing arguments and engages in debate about the overall merits of each side (i.e., clash).

I also love a good turn. But, make sure to back up the turnaround and show its impact.

Please, minimal spreading. In other words, you may go fast but don't overwhelm me with rapid-fire arguments or try to trick the other side into missing what you have said.

Be respectful and avoid using POIs as weapons to disrupt your opponent simply for the sake of throwing them off. I value POIs as strategic questions used to lay the groundwork or further a team's argument or counterexample.

The feedback I give after the round is meant as a way to help you grow and improve your debate techniques. Please do not view anything I say as criticism. Take what helps and leave the rest.

Parent of debate students. Debated throughout HS and College.

I like for debaters to make strong, clear arguments and those are made stronger with evidence - research, real-world, or logic.

I like to see debaters stay organized and "put" their arguments against other arguments vs allowing me to determine what a claim rebuts or rebuilds. I like direct clash.

Finally, I like the arguments to be assessed and weighted by debaters throughout, but particularly in the rebuttals.

If it is argued and introduced in the round, I entertain it and believe it until disproven.

hi.

im prisha and i've been doing PF for about 4 years now

you can speak fast if you'd like but please keep it in moderation. its not that cool to speak fast anyway

FOR PF:

add me to the email chain for cards: prishavora@gmail.com

please please please weigh and extend your arguments or else I cannot vote for them

things that will get you 30 speaks (your speeches also have to good)

• make a reference to formula 1 in any speech
• flow with a sharpie

things I don't tolerate: just like all other judges, under any circumstances do not be racist, sexist, etc.

please DONT

• dont do offtime roadmaps
• dont spend a crazy amount of time sending cards

just a heads up I do not flow cross but I do listen and will note if anything very major happens like if someone contradicts their own argument. also I do like heated crossfire but please be respectful. push yourself to ask questions that point out flaws in your opponents case. don't ask questions that don't help the debate or move it forward.

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE tell me why you win the debate and why your opponents don't or else you give me more of a decision to make which might not favor you at the end of the day.

if you have any question about my reason for decision or if you want any personal feedback please ask during round, but in any case if anything comes up after the rounds you can email me @: prishavora@gmail.com

I began my journey in debating as a recreational activity but it quickly evolved into a passion and lifestyle. With experience, I bring a blend of enthusiasm and practical insight to the judging table.

In debate, I value depth of analysis, clarity of expression, and engagement with opposing viewpoints. I encourage debaters to construct well-supported arguments, actively engage with their opponents's position and strive for meaningful clash and resolution.