Experience: This is my third year doing high school policy debate at Sumner Academy.

What I prefer and look for in a round:

I prefer plans with evidence stating specifically how plan solves; give me the details, the funding mechanisms, time frame, etc. If opposing team points out vagueness in plan solvency, I'll be less likely to vote on that plan.

All off-case is welcome, but I will most likely not vote on topicality and find it a waste of time. Not a fan of extinction arguments.