Shattuck Invitational
2024
—
Shattuck,
OK/US
Speech Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
Nick Bradt
Alva High Goldbugs
Last changed on
Thu January 4, 2024 at 4:13 AM CDT
I use to consider myself a stock issues judge....But I'm slowly moving away from it I'm good with T as long as it's done right. I'm ok with K's and CP's, But I wouldn't bank on winning with that alone. Also I prefer closed CX...and I REALY prefer closed constructive and rebuttals. Spreading is fine as long as I can understand the tag lines.
Chris Eckhardt
Alva High Goldbugs
None
Nikki Farrington
Okeene High School
None
Shala Knowles
Arnett Wildcats
None
Lorrie Moore
Okeene High School
None
Jason Paris
Cherokee HS
None
John Vickers
Alva High Goldbugs
Last changed on
Fri March 1, 2024 at 7:05 AM CDT
I believe in well constructed Affirmatives that are Prima Facia. I believe T is used as a generic argument to waste time. Unless the case is actually Untopical/Abusive, I won't vote for it. I like to see real world argumentation with real advantages/disadvantages. Unless you can actually tell me the closest we have been to Nuclear war, and that we are there now, I won't buy it. Let's see clash on the stock issues. I would much rather see you debate the actual topic rather than debate theory. This is Policy debate
Spread at your own risk. If I can't understand your points because you don't slow down and label contentions and points, how am I going to know where it goes on the flow.
I haven't met a K that I have voted for.
LD-I just want clash and a spirited debate on Values and points. I will flow everything in the round and use it in my decision making
PF-I want to see good clash of points with sound reasoning. And politeness in CX. If you are rude or barking in your Crossfire, it will probably reflect in your rankings