OSAA District 12
2024
—
Reynolds,
OR/US
Judges Paradigm List
All Paradigms:
Show
Hide
Carol Allen
Reynolds High School
None
Kaedon Apezteguia
Sam Barlow HS
None
Liz Bernal
Sam Barlow HS
None
Jeanney Bloomer
Sandy High School
None
Stephanie Camberg
Reynolds High School
None
Last changed on
Sat February 8, 2020 at 3:36 AM PDT
I did mainly public forum in high school, but I've tried every debate at least once.
I don't like spreading, I don't mind a bit of speed just keep in mind if I don't understand or catch what you're saying then I can't factor it into my judging.
Please be polite to one another.
I like to see good clash and I like good impacts.
Angela Evans
Sam Barlow HS
None
Heather Finkas
Reynolds High School
None
Molly Frye
Reynolds High School
None
Ming Fung
Sam Barlow HS
None
Cole Garber
Gresham High School
None
Tom Gardiner
Sam Barlow HS
None
John Goldstein
Reynolds High School
None
Danielle Grabiel
Sandy High School
None
Madeline Hunt
Reynolds High School
None
Jamaica Jones
Sam Barlow HS
Last changed on
Thu February 15, 2024 at 10:00 AM PDT
I am a tabula rasa judge for the most part. I expect teams to show why arguments should be voted on, instead of assuming a certain paradigm. Basically, tell me how your impacts outweigh at the end of the round. I am fine with speed and K.
Adrienne Malan
Gresham High School
None
Brian Malan
Gresham High School
None
Cary Mallon
Sandy High School
None
Tessa Mayernik
Sam Barlow HS
None
Chris Meyers
Sandy High School
Last changed on
Fri March 15, 2024 at 10:10 AM PDT
Public Forum debate is not designed to be a talk as fast as you can debate. It is designed to be spoken at a clear and reasonable rate and pace. As a newer judge I want to be able to keep up with the debate.
Kaden Meyers
Sandy High School
None
Parker Meyers
Sandy High School
None
Stephanie Michaelsen
Sam Barlow HS
None
Thomas Murphy
Reynolds High School
None
Aidan Muth
Centennial High School
None
Lynette Nixon
Sandy High School
None
Jeff Puukka
Sam Barlow HS
None
Kimberly Richmond
Reynolds High School
None
Timothy Rodgers
Reynolds High School
None
Sharon Schiller
Reynolds High School
None
Austin Schubert
Sam Barlow HS
Last changed on
Fri March 1, 2024 at 11:48 PM PDT
I did Policy debate in highschool, College parli, and college LD. So I have some experience and can judge any type of debate.
I am open to any style of debate, whether more kritik focused or policy.
I will vote on theroy that as long as youre winning the flo0w and have standards and voters
Make sure you extend your arguments and have competitve and impacts with magnitude, probability, timeframe.
Use framework if possible, to frame yourself ahead in the round.
Overall I like debates that are respectful, have good clash, and are creative in their case and/or argumentation.
Brian Sonnier
Sandy High School
None
nabeel sweilem
Reynolds High School
None
CODI TILLSON
Sam Barlow HS
None
Jody Tucker
Parkrose High School
None
Rachael Wilczewski
Sam Barlow HS
Last changed on
Fri April 19, 2024 at 1:45 AM PDT
Hi all :)
I am the head coach of Parkrose High School and am also assistant debate coach for Sam Barlow High School, both in the Portland, OR area. At Parkrose, I primarily coach policy for the Oregon/NAUDL/Nat Cir. but I have students who do IE's and other debate events. For Sam Barlow, I specifically coach their WSD team.
I did policy debate in high school and parli (NPDA) in college, nat cir. I have either debated, debated against or am familiar with most, if not all, arguments out there. I spent my time debating policy and k arguments pretty equally - but maybe more k heavy - both on the aff and neg. I judge on the tech and flow of the debate and will hear any argument you can justify - with some exceptions (ex: don't impact turn racism or say feminism doesn't matter (I have seen it happen, don't be that person, I will do anything from vote you down and tank your speaks to potentially, depending on the round, report you to tab). Have fun with it, I love to hear fun and interesting stuff :) I will also be happy hearing a policy aff and a DA / CP / T debate. Don't feel like you have to get fancy with it if it's not the best strategic choice for you. I want to hear whatever will make the best debate possible. Debate the topic, don't debate the topic, reject the topic, whatever you choose to do, just be prepared to do it well. I also encourage the use of alternative modalities if that's something you like to do. I want to create a space where you can say what you want and feel free to run any arguments you would like. If you have any other questions about any specific arguments or types of arguments, please ask before the round.
Speed - I am just getting back into debate after a few years off so please take it a ~little~ slower on tags and non-carded arguments than you normally would, for your sake. Feel free to still spread but on tags, analytics, and theory arguments please slow down a tiny bit, especially with theory. I was a very fast debater and I understand the need to go as quick as you can (little time, lots of args) but I am a little out-of-practice with debate speed and do not want to miss anything that could be important to you later on. This is mainly targeted at extremely fast debaters, if you don't feel like you're in the top percentiles of speed, you're probably fine.
Signposting - I feel like the vast majority of HS debaters do not know how to speak in a way that signals to the judge with clarity when they are moving to different arguments down the flow. I should, in general, be able to tell where you are based on what you're saying but HS debates can be very messy, so please, do make it as clear for me as possible. Verbally signaling, whether through just saying where you're at and what you're responding to, saying "next" in between args, or using other tone/volume/pausing indicators (more advanced skill), make sure you're letting me know in some capacity where to write an argument. If I don't have to spend time figuring out where you are on the flow, it not only looks a lot better on you but it also means I can hear more warrants / examples etc. in depth and overall makes it a lot easier for you to win the debate. Tell me when you're on the link level or the alternative or the perm debate.
Pet Peeves:
- Being ~too~ aggressive in cross-ex. Cross-ex can get heated. I have been there, and I understand that sometimes it's just part of debate, but sometimes, there are times when it clearly goes beyond being competitive. From a judge perspective, aggression in cross-ex can come off anywhere from being passionate and competitive to being condescending, demeaning, and potentially misogynist. You are in control of how you treat others within the debate space. We all create the environment that is "the debate space", make sure you are acting in alignment with what you think it should look like.
- Running things you don't know. I understand that it can be difficult to know all in the ins and outs of an argument when breaking it for the first time. I also get wanting to try new things that you may not know all that much about. But, it's very easy to tell when someone is reading an argument they know next to nothing about and are betting that they know just enough to beat someone knows nothing about it. I don't think it produces very good debates and is often a strategy used to avoid meaningful clash. (this is mainly about k's - if you're going to read a k, please AT LEAST be able to explain the link and alternative in your own words as well as how it relates to the topic/aff).
- Extending arguments without actually explaining the argument. If you're extending an argument / author, I need at the very least the claim + warrant and how this argument functions in the debate. You can extend a card that says "x" but if I don't have an extension of x bc y and this is important bc a + b, then it makes the debate hallow and very circular. I find that high school policy debaters have the biggest problem doing this well because of the reliance on cards and evidence. For example, do not just say "extend the link" say "extend (insert author) who says (insert claim + warrant). the aff is doing (insert plan / part of plan the offcase position links to) which relates to (what author says) in xyz way which creates ~whatever impact~". I get that everyone is pressed for time but the work done on these explanations in the constructives are important and set up the rest of the debate if done properly.
Rachel Wilczewski
Sam Barlow HS
Last changed on
Wed January 3, 2024 at 6:44 AM PDT
Background
I was a high school and college policy debater in the 1980's. I have taught policy debate for 21 years both in California and Oregon. I have coached several policy teams to nationals. I love this form of debate.
Paradigm
I am a real world policy maker judge, who is somewhat traditional. I look to see who advocates for most viable and beneficial policy. I am a recovering stock issues judge.
What Makes Me Smile
I like to see an organized flow, with lots of analysis connecting evidence to claims. I also like to see a fun spirited debate, where debaters are polite to one another and are in this activity to learn, not just to win.
Speed
I can flow a fast debate, but prefer communication over speed. I find that most policy debaters who spew, can't really handle the speed they are attempting and therefore lose their judge and opponents, ultimately rendering this communication event moot. However, if you must race through your arguments, at least be slow and clear on the tags.
K's
I do not like Kritiks. I will listen to them and weigh them against other arguments on the flow, but overall am not a big fan. If you run a K, make sure to fully explain your philosophical position and don't run positions that will bite your K.
T
I will vote on T if not used as a time suck. "If you run it, go for it, don't kick out of 4 T's in your last rebuttal."
Tag Team CX
I don't mind tag team cx; however, I award speaker points based on your ability to ask and answer questions, so if one partner is "tooling" another, then one of you will suffer point wise. I like to see that both partners are knowledgable about the topic and debate theory and get disgruntled when one partner will not allow the other partner a chance to answer any questions.
Flex Prep
What? Really? No!
Flashtime
I don't count flash time as prep time, unless it becomes ridiculous.