Hello. I am a parent judge.

I am a CONSERVATIVE 75-year-old parent of 8, grandparent of 64, great-grand-parent of 512, and great-great-grand-parent of 4096. You may know me from when I was I was on the judging panel when President Trump defeated Biden in the 2020 election, in a vote of 538-0! In Humblest regards, you may know my family from

-Our peaceful protest on January 6 (release my Prisoners, Joe)

-Our Musicality: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfCYZ3pks48

-Our favorite Child: KANYE!

I am faithful to family, Friends, faith, and life. I am pro-life, pro-gun, pro-Trump, Christian, and 100% PROUD AMERICAN! When you are debating, I AM YOUR SUPERIOR! I have a PhD in argumentative Writing and Philosophy. In my teenage prime, I debated for the Columbus Academy in up state New York in AMERICAN parliamentary (before I got out of that LIBERAL dumpster fire) where I WON THE LOCAL COUNTY CHAMPIONSHIP against my arch-rival and CRIMINAL Bill (Cosby!) Clinton. ALSO, if I see you have Competed in BRITISH parliamentary or WORLD SCHOOLS debate, I will Report you to the Ethics Officer! AMERICA FIRST!!!

When I am judging you, do not make statements that are Objectively Wrong. This includes anything I disagree with. It is up to the skill of the debater to interpret in that regard.

I will NEVER give more than 15 SPEAKER POINTS! We are alaready in DEBT of points and I WONT RAISE the Ceiling! I am FISCALLY and SPEAKILY Conservative!

I will judge off of a Secret math equation, which can Be found at this Driver: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Kkn_KZ0Nkq4x-e2EMpzyYF87X_FTE9oByxUh9OndSKc/edit#slide=id.p

Here are some of my beliefs:

-NO THEORY! That is what the climate change LIARS use to back up their FALSE claims!!!

-Do not Spread, because that is for the fascist liberal DEMOCRATS spreading LIES about the 2020 election!!

-Do not use TRICKS, TREATS ONLY!!

-Do not use FRAMEWORK because that says the framing of my great-great-grand-son Jacob (Angel) Angeli worked which it didn't!! It was ANTIFA Fascists Rioters all along!!

-What is a KRITIK?? Only THING I WILL be critiquing is your SPELING!!!

-WHY do People Critique (spelled rigt) CAPITALISM?? CAPITALISM is The best and I Know because my great-grandchild EUGENE is AN ACCOUNTANT!!

-What is a PHIL? I Only know the DOCTOR!!!

-I judge off of CROSSFIRE. The louder Your voice, the BETTER!

-I have ALL the best Cognition with ALL the top Grammar. If You don't speak like me, you DEPORT your chance. Cheek me out.

-Reading Russian Revionism about my grandson's Boyfriend Vladimir is a DROP from me!

-You can find my actual paradigm here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Nx-4b8fpz1nGG-xVAdzIqLfcLl3UCLqL85c_B9c_cbM/edit?usp=sharing

Edit: I have Seen people saying my paradigm is the GREATEST on tab room. KEEP TABROOM GREAT! BUT, also I have seen People STEALING my paradigm... If you do, I will put you into a COFFVEFE!!

DEBATE ROUNDS

To win my ballot: Logical links and clear connections are important whether you're running a traditional or progressive case. Your argumentation skills and strategies is what your opponent is challenging, therefore; a clear, cut, concise connection is what wins the round. Listen to your opponent, (FLOW), provide impacts and know what your talking about. If you've got a few tricks up your sleeve, be sure you know how to use them.

I do not mind speed, but if you decide to spread make sure you slow down on tag-lines. Consider speaker points when spreading. I look to vote for a strong link and one's ability to prove why your case wins the round. Voters are extremely important to me so make sure you use the time in your last speech wisely.

I do my best to flow all arguments presented in the debate and rely heavily on my flow to determine the round winner. Make sure to signpost well, and please give me a roadmap of your speeches.

If you decide to do an email chain please, add me. mhix@neisd.net

Speaker Points

Positives: politeness, confidence, well-placed humor, preparation and well executed strategies/arguments.

Negatives: rudeness and unnecessary condescending comments, pointless cross examination, skirting the issues or avoidance

SPEECH ROUNDS

Staying true to the competition rubrics.

If I can't hear you, then I can't score you. Please, speak loud and clear.

Starting out 2024 as a notable unbiased judge

Email: blessingnkojo@gmail.com

You can catch me sparing at ALDD (speechforces) when am not Coaching at RSUDS

Crucial points about my philosophy on debate:

- Equity:

I believe that the fairest debates are those where there is no discrimination or use of derogatory language towards opponents or their arguments. Every argument should be respected and considered.

Things to avoid:

1. Do not classify any argument as nonsensical or stupid.

2. Do not make generalizations based on identity, race, or gender, as this can be stereotypical and provoke retaliation.

Things to do:

1. Be specific when analyzing people or places to avoid generalizations.

2. Approach every argument with a critical lens, refer to it, engage with it, rebut it, and respectfully counter propose. Now that this is clear,

please read before speaking if I am judging you…

Typically, I start evaluating during the second speech in any debate round. Therefore, I am more impressed by students who demonstrate topic knowledge, line-by-line organization skills (supported by careful note-taking), and intelligent cross-examinations, rather than those who rely on speaking quickly, using confusing language, jargon, or recycling arguments.

I have become more open to philosophy-style arguments in the past year. However, I have not extensively studied any specific literature bases. Philosophy arguments that are solely used to trick opponents will not win my vote. However, I am open to well-developed philosophy strategies. Since I am an ordinary intelligent voter, you need to ensure that your explanations are clear and robust in explaining how to evaluate your arguments.

Counter Proposals: Especially in policy debates, but not limited to them, counter proposals that aim to change the focus of the prompt (resolve) will be disregarded as they do not meet the necessary criteria. Use a counter proposal only if it is absolutely necessary or if it aligns with the spirit of the debate. My evaluation of a good counter proposal is just as important as my evaluation of the original prompt.

Goodluck..............

Hi there,

My name is Oyewumi Emmanuel Oluwatobi, I am a student at the University of Ilorin, Nigeria. I am a regular debater, public speaker and judge, with over 2 years involvement in debating. I am currently employing my vast speaking and judging experience to judge speech and debate. I have gathered ample experience judging different speech and debate formats including British Parliamentary (BP), Asian Parliamentary (AP), Public Forum (PF), Congress, CX, LD, Extemp.

Email address: oyewumioluwatobi2@gmail.com

Conflicts: I do not have any.

PERSONAL NOTE

I think of debate as a way to share ideas on different matters and make those ideas stronger by pointing out flaws and loopholes in them. I also see it as a game of arguments and whoever's argument that has the least flaws, provides accommodations for those flaws or prove why their arguments regardless of those flaws matter wins.

I have experience in British Parliamentary and public forum debate format, both speaking and judging. Though I prefer speaking. I am an ESL speaker, so I would also like people to know that, so it's not hard to understand you when you're speaking.

Lastly, I'm a nice person, and I like every debater in any round I am judging to be nice to one another and learn from each other. So, there is no need to be rude to each other in a debate round.

It's my belief that in every round, even if one loses, there is always something to learn, something to improve on.

Looking forward to working together. Thank you

Iu