Spring TOC Chengdu Inter school Debate and Speech League
2024 — Chengdu, CN
General Pool Paradigm List
All Paradigms: Show HidePublic Forum
1. You have a limited amount of time use it wisely. Collapse the debate down to the voting issues you believe you are winning.
2. Offense is more important than defense.
3. Weigh the debate accordingly.
4. I engage in paper flowing during debates; however, I do not specifically flow during crossfire, though I ensure to pay close attention. My hope is for debaters to view crossfire as an opportunity for polite and orderly exchanges, leading to meaningful conversations, rather than resorting to aggression and unwarranted accusations.
5. I will base my decision based on sound logic and drops on the flow.
About me
I have been coaching and judging PF for more than 4 years.
The execution of the argument is almost as important as the quality of the evidence supporting the argument. A really good disad with good cards that is poorly explained and poorly extended is not compelling to me. Conversely a well explained argument with evidence of poor quality is also unlikely to impress me.I care more about the analysis of the linkage.
Crossfire: is very important. Cross-ex should be more than I need this card and what is your third answer to X.
About Framework:
please kindly explain why your framework is more important in debates.
Free feel ask me questions if you have any
akram0217@gmail.com
George Gao
2.Tell us about your debate judging experience.a.I have never judged debate before.
b.I have judged debate for less than a year and this is my first time judging Public Forum.
c.I have judged debate for less than a year and have judged Public Forum before.
d.I have judged debate for more than a year, but Public Forum for less than a year.
√ e.I have judged Public Forum debate for more than a year.
3.Tell us about your debating experience.a.I have never debated competitively before.
b.I debated Public Forum for less than a year.
c.I debated other formats for less than a year.
d.I have debated Public Forum for more than a year.
√ e.I have debated other formats for more than a year, but not Public Forum.
4.What is your speaking speed preference?a.Deliberate speed (100-120wpm)
b.Conversational speed (120-150wpm)
√ c.TED talk speed (150-200wpm)
d.Fast speed (200+wpm)
5.How much do you know about the topic?a.I coach debate and have researched this topic
b.I have professional-level knowledge about this topic.
c.I regularly read news about this topic. It’s an interest of mine.
√ d.I pay attention to this topic, but I don’t go out of my way to know about it.
e.I have no idea about the topic. Please make sure I understand things.
6.Do you think the second rebuttal speaker should be expected to respond directly to the first rebuttal speaker (frontlining)?a.Yes, if the second rebuttal doesn’t respond to the first rebuttal I consider it a dropped argument
√ b.No, the second speaker rebuttal is only responsible for answering the first constructive
c.I’m not sure.
d.Other (please specify)
7.How important is the flow (your notes) in making your decision? What do you write down in your notes?a.It’s very important. I take lots of notes and make my decision based almost entirely based on my notes.
√ b.It’s somewhat important. I use my notes to aid me in making my decision.
c.It’s not that important. I tend to judge the debate more wholistically.
d.Other (Please Specify)
8.What factors go into your decision as to who wins the debate?· Valid logic link in the speech that has not been successfully challenged by opponents.
· Magnitude of impact, summarizing the impact of all arguments.
· Fulfillment of duty (engagement, status quo, etc)
9.Is there anything else you would like the debaters to know about you?I study electronic information engineering in university, so I may not have enough knowledge about complicated economic and social science terms.
Judge Philosophies
1.Judge’s NameElaine Hu
2.Tell us about your debate judging experience.
a.I have never judged debate before.
b.I have judged debate for less than a year and this is my first time judging Public Forum.
c.I have judged debate for less than a year and have judged Public Forum before.
d.I have judged debate for more than a year, but Public Forum for less than a year.â
e.I have judged Public Forum debate for more than a year.
3.Tell us about your debating experience.
a.I have never debated competitively before.
b.I debated Public Forum for less than a year.â
c.I debated other formats for less than a year.
d.I have debated Public Forum for more than a year.
e.I have debated other formats for more than a year, but not Public Forum.
4.What is your speaking speed preference?
a.Deliberate speed (100-120wpm)
b.Conversational speed (120-150wpm)â
c.TED talk speed (150-200wpm)
d.Fast speed (200+wpm)
5.How much do you know about the topic?
a.I coach debate and have researched this topic
b.I have professional-level knowledge about this topic.
c.I regularly read news about this topic. It’s an interest of mine.â
d.I pay attention to this topic, but I don’t go out of my way to know about it.
e.I have no idea about the topic. Please make sure I understand things.
6.Do you think the second rebuttal speaker should be expected to respond directly to the first rebuttal speaker (frontlining)?
a.Yes, if the second rebuttal doesn’t respond to the first rebuttal I consider it a dropped argument
b.No, the second speaker rebuttal is only responsible for answering the first constructiveâ
c.I’m not sure.
d.Other (please specify)
7.How important is the flow (your notes) in making your decision? What do you write down in your notes?
a.It’s very important. I take lots of notes and make my decision based almost entirely based on my notes.
b.It’s somewhat important. I use my notes to aid me in making my decision.â
c.It’s not that important. I tend to judge the debate more wholistically.
d.Other (Please Specify)
8.What factors go into your decision as to who wins the debate?
Constructive speech with enough reasoning and impact
Crossfire win is the most important metric in my judging
I prefer debaters do rebut more smartly by knowing what you say and based on what you’ve researched.
9.Is there anything else you would like the debaters to know about you?
no
1. Judge’s Name Reine Huang 2. Tell us about your debate judging experience.
a. I have never judged debate before.
b. I have judged debate for less than a year and this is my first time judging Public Forum.
c. I have judged debate for less than a year and have judged Public Forum before.
d. I have judged debate for more than a year, but Public Forum for less than a year.
e. I have judged Public Forum debate for more than a year.
3. Tell us about your debating experience.a. I have never debated competitively before.
b. I debated Public Forum for less than a year.
c. I debated other formats for less than a year.
d. I have debated Public Forum for more than a year.
e. I have debated other formats for more than a year, but not Public Forum.
4. What is your speaking speed preference?a. Deliberate speed (100-120wpm)
b. Conversational speed (120-150wpm)
c. TED talk speed (150-200wpm)
d. Fast speed (200+wpm)
5. How much do you know about the topic?a. I coach debate and have researched this topic
b. I have professional-level knowledge about this topic.
c. I regularly read news about this topic. It’s an interest of mine.
d. I pay attention to this topic, but I don’t go out of my way to know about it.
e. I have no idea about the topic. Please make sure I understand things.
6. Do you think the second rebuttal speaker should be expected to respond directly to the first rebuttal speaker (frontlining)?a. Yes, if the second rebuttal doesn’t respond to the first rebuttal I consider it a dropped argument
b. No, the second speaker rebuttal is only responsible for answering the first constructive
c. I’m not sure.
d. Other (please specify)
7. How important is the flow (your notes) in making your decision? What do you write down in your notes?a. It’s very important. I take lots of notes and make my decision based almost entirely based on my notes.
b. It’s somewhat important. I use my notes to aid me in making my decision.
c. It’s not that important. I tend to judge the debate more wholistically.
d. Other (Please Specify)
8. What factors go into your decision as to who wins the debate?Engagement; Clearity; Comparison and characterization; Logical linkage/mechanism/impact of the argument/contention itself.
9. Is there anything else you would like the debaters to know about you?Nothing.
a. I have never judged debate before.
b. I have judged debate for less than a year and this is my first time judging Public Forum.
c. I have judged debate for less than a year and have judged Public Forum before.
d. I have judged debate for more than a year, but Public Forum for less than a year.
e. I have judged Public Forum debate for more than a year.
3. Tell us about your debating experience.a. I have never debated competitively before.
b. I debated Public Forum for less than a year.
c. I debated other formats for less than a year.
d. I have debated Public Forum for more than a year.
e. I have debated other formats for more than a year, but not Public Forum.
4. What is your speaking speed preference?a. Deliberate speed (100-120wpm)
b. Conversational speed (120-150wpm)
c. TED talk speed (150-200wpm)
d. Fast speed (200+wpm)
5. How much do you know about the topic?a. I coach debate and have researched this topic
b. I have professional-level knowledge about this topic.
c. I regularly read news about this topic. It’s an interest of mine.
d. I pay attention to this topic, but I don’t go out of my way to know about it.
e. I have no idea about the topic. Please make sure I understand things.
6. Do you think the second rebuttal speaker should be expected to respond directly to the first rebuttal speaker (frontlining)?a. Yes, if the second rebuttal doesn’t respond to the first rebuttal I consider it a dropped argument
b. No, the second speaker rebuttal is only responsible for answering the first constructive
c. I’m not sure.
d. Other (please specify)
7. How important is the flow (your notes) in making your decision? What do you write down in your notes?a. It’s very important. I take lots of notes and make my decision based almost entirely based on my notes.
b. It’s somewhat important. I use my notes to aid me in making my decision.
c. It’s not that important. I tend to judge the debate more wholistically.
d. Other (Please Specify)
8. What factors go into your decision as to who wins the debate?The effectiveness of your own case—comprising the clarity of your claim, the coherence of your mechanism, and the significance of your impact. Equally crucial is your engagement with your opponents' case, including rebuttals, weighing etc. Lastly, the adequacy and quality of your evidence—encompassing its truthfulness, authority, importance, and influence.
9. Is there anything else you would like the debaters to know about you?I firmly believe that it's essential to respect your opponents in a debate, steering clear of any aggressive intentions or actions, and instead opting for a polite and courteous approach.
Judge Philosophies
1. Judge’s Name:Frederic
2. Tell us about your debate judging experience.
a. I have never judged debate before.
b. I have judged debate for less than a year and this is my first time judging Public Forum.
c. I have judged debate for less than a year and have judged Public Forum before.
d. I have judged debate for more than a year, but Public Forum for less than a year.
e. I have judged Public Forum debate for more than a year.
3. Tell us about your debating experience.
a. I have never debated competitively before.
b. I debated Public Forum for less than a year.
c. I debated other formats for less than a year.
d. I have debated Public Forum for more than a year.
e. I have debated other formats for more than a year, but not Public Forum.
4. What is your speaking speed preference?
a. Deliberate speed (100-120wpm)
b. Conversational speed (120-150wpm)
c. TED talk speed (150-200wpm)
d. Fast speed (200+wpm)
5. How much do you know about the topic?
a. I coach debate and have researched this topic
b. I have professional-level knowledge about this topic.
c. I regularly read news about this topic. It’s an interest of mine.
d. I pay attention to this topic, but I don’t go out of my way to know about it.
e. I have no idea about the topic. Please make sure I understand things.
6. Do you think the second rebuttal speaker should be expected to respond directly to the first rebuttal speaker (frontlining)?
a. Yes, if the second rebuttal doesn’t respond to the first rebuttal I consider it a dropped argument
b. No, the second speaker rebuttal is only responsible for answering the first constructive
c. I’m not sure.
d. Other (please specify)
7. How important is the flow (your notes) in making your decision? What do you write down in your notes?
a. It’s very important. I take lots of notes and make my decision based almost entirely based on my notes.
b. It’s somewhat important. I use my notes to aid me in making my decision.
c. It’s not that important. I tend to judge the debate more wholistically.
d. Other (Please Specify)
8. What factors go into your decision as to who wins the debate?
Strength of Arguments:
The quality of arguments presented by each side plays a significant role. Strong arguments are those that are logically sound, supported by evidence, and relevant to the topic.
Rebuttal and Counterarguments:
Debaters should anticipate and address opposing arguments effectively. This involves providing counterarguments and refuting opposing points with evidence and logic.
Logical Reasoning:
Debaters must demonstrate logical reasoning by making coherent points and drawing valid conclusions. Logical fallacies weaken an argument and can sway the outcome against the debater who commits them.
9. Is there anything else you would like the debaters to know about you?
No more.
QWQ
Judge Philosophies
1. Judge’s Name: Eileen Zhong
2. Tell us about your debate judging experience.
I have judged Public Forum debate for more than a year.
3. Tell us about your debating experience.
a. I have debated other formats for more than a year, but not Public Forum.
4. What is your speaking speed preference?
TED talk speed (150-200wpm)
d 5. How much do you know about the topic?
a. I coach debate and have researched this topic.
b. 6. Do you think the second rebuttal speaker should be expected to respond directly to the first rebuttal speaker (frontlining)?
a Yes, if the second rebuttal doesn’t respond to the first rebuttal I consider it a dropped argument.
b 7. How important is the flow (your notes) in making your decision? What do you write down in your notes?
It’s very important. I take lots of notes and make my decision based almost entirely based on my notes.
b 8. What factors go into your decision as to who wins the debate?
First, importance: the speaker’s topic should be important to the human condition. This appears in the beginning of the speech through a well-developed thesis. Throughout the oration, the student should use ethos to build credibility and offer examples supporting the significance of the topic. The delivery can also indicate importance. Pathos is created through a personable, invested delivery that speaks to the audience emotionally. The speaker should be clearly passionate about the topic in order to establish pathos.
Second, relatability: relatability is how the speaker connects the audience to the topic. The speaker should use inclusive rhetoric, giving the audience the sensation that they are affected by the topic. Logical evidence supporting this sentiment should be given throughout the speech.
Third, originality: Whether the rhetoric is unique and how new and exciting the examples are.
Fourth, performance: Did the student use gestures, movement, eye contact, tone and volume, etc. to enhance the message of the speech? Did their delivery show significant preparation, or do they appear to struggle to memorize their speech?
My idea of a good speech:
Organization
- Clear structures
- Effective transitions
- Natural development of speech
Analysis
- Direct address to the prompt
- Justifications for ideas
- Establish significance to the points
- Examples should be explained and linked to ideas
Delivery
- Confidence
- Effective voice movement and expression
- Appropriate volume
- Eye contact
What I look for in a debate
Arguments
- Clear and relevant
- Organized and easy to follow
- Strong credible evidence
- Current events
- Historical data
- Cite reliable source
Rebuttal
- Rebut each point
- Tackle logical fallacies if you can
- Explain Why your own position is more preferable
Time allocation
- Spend enough time on important points
Teamwork
- Unified development
- Complementary arguments
Style and rhetoric (least important)
- Fluent and compelling
- Appropriate pace (I won’t write anything down if I can’t hear)