Firstly in application to all debates please be respectful to your opponents as much as humanly possible, this especially applies to CX periods if you're not nice during these you will be jacked for it, debate should be fun for all. As it is exactly what I do I am more than okay with fast speeches and cases, but please make sure to signpost everything you are doing and make sure your opponent is okay with you speaking quickly.

LD: Luckily for you folks, LD is the debate I am the most versed in. Meaning I am more than capable of keeping up with shorthanded terms and difficult topics. As it is specific to LD I will often vote on the framing of values; show me why both cases should follow your framework. I flow very closely and will be able to see arguments if things aren't attacked. If you point it out and are right that almost always secures a win for the round. In your case, if the link chain is strong that's an early advantage. Overall, I will vote on frame, the spread of arguments, and more importantly tech over truth.

PF: Very important for PF kids, please tell me where cards are from and why they are credible. If they aren't explained and your opponents call that out it looks bad on the flow. In PF the use of questioning periods is so important. If you can use it to your advantage and tie back to the questions that's a likely vote for you. Make sure to flow arguments if you aren't I am and I will see when things aren't attacked/defended. If an opponent doesn't attack or defend something point it out and I will probably vote on that. Importantly I will vote a lot on tech over truth.