I will vote for anything (to prove, I have made an extinction good file). I enjoy theory most. I don’t generally debate Ks so I might be less knowledgeable with Ks. I’m not the person you should read a K aff on, unless the other team completely mishandles T. Unless a team tells me not to, I use competing interps to judge T.

If you do not extent an argument in some way (preferably overviews), then I will flow the argument to the other team.

Quite frankly, I never quite got presumption. If neither team has an argument in the 2AR I am voting affirmative because why not. That isn’t to say I refuse to vote negative in that situation, but the argument must be made. “Vote negative on presumption” is not enough for me.

This topic is too big and the neg is too bad for the affirmative to not disclose. In open/novice, The affirmative should name the plan when asked.

Theory over substance and nothing can convince me otherwise.

I literally don’t mind if you lie/don’t use evidence, just know that actual cards will trump pure confidence.

If you bring up the rules of debate, then I will immediately vote against you. I will laugh as I do so. Debate has no rules except speech times. To say otherwise is to incur my personal wrath.

Use she/they pronouns for me. Mistakes will not be met with mercy.