Judge Paradigm: Jerenisha Thomas

Public Forum (PF):
In PF, I place a strong emphasis on framework and impact weighing. I expect debaters to establish clear frameworks at the beginning of the round that guide how I should evaluate the round. When it comes to arguments, I need to see impacts weighed thoroughly throughout the round. Comparisons between magnitude, probability, and timeframe are crucial in helping me decide the winner. Debaters should make it explicit how their impacts outweigh those of their opponents, and I appreciate when the weighing is done consistently rather than saved for the final speeches.

-Framework is key: I want a clear lens through which to evaluate the debate.
- Weigh early and often: Impact calculus should not wait until the summary or final focus. The more weighing is done throughout the round, the better.
- Clash and direct comparison: I like seeing debaters directly engage with each other's impacts and explain why their arguments prevail in the broader context of the round.

Lincoln-Douglas (LD): (No spreading)
In LD, I consider myself more of a flow judge. I follow the arguments on the flow closely and prioritize line-by-line argumentation. I expect debaters to engage with each other's contentions directly, extending key arguments throughout the round. Value and criterion debates are important, and I will use them to frame my decision, but I also look for strong, well-warranted philosophical or policy arguments that connect back to these frameworks.

- Clear extensions: Be sure to extend key arguments through every speech if you want them considered in my decision.
- Clarity over speed: While I can follow faster debaters, clarity is always appreciated. If I miss something due to unclear presentation, I can't evaluate it.
- Flow-centric: I will evaluate the round primarily based on the flow, so be sure to engage directly with your opponent's arguments.

General Notes:
- I have a tech over truth philosophy: I will evaluate arguments based on how they are debated in-round, rather than inserting my own views or opinions.
- Signposting and roadmaps are appreciated in both formats to keep things organized and clear.
- Be sure to extend and weigh your impacts. A dropped argument can be decisive, so don't overlook any important parts of the flow.

If you have any questions before the round begins, feel free to ask!