Last changed on
Sat January 20, 2024 at 4:45 AM EDT
Background:
I debated for 3 years in high school, mainly focusing on LD. I debated in college at the University of Utah in Parli and LD. I understand the mechanisms in which debate functions, both on policy-oriented and critical arguments.
Speed:
I’m fine with speed, slow down on tag lines, repeat advocacies twice, I will clear you twice then drop my pen. Don’t spread your opponent out of the round.
Theory:
Don’t run frivolous theory, only run it if your engagement in the round is really at jeopardy. If you present a good enough reason for me to vote on theory, I will. I default to competing interpretations as a way to evaluate. If you want to go for reasonability give me a bright line as to what is reasonable and what isn’t. I use standards as a metric for measuring abuse in the round so be sure to do sufficient analysis on them. Be very thorough in your voters.
Kritiks:
I LOVE THEM; but do them well. Don’t run identity kritiks if it’s not your identity, unless you have a unique way of engaging in the discussion that doesn’t speak for others or co-opt. Don’t commodify identity arguments for the sake of a ballot. They matter, and have the power to change rhetoric and modes of engagement. If you run unconventional criticisms, explain them to me with an elementary thesis.
In/Out of Round Conduct:
USE TRIGGER WARNINGS- don’t even bring up sexual assault/slurs/violence/gore without one to everyone in the room.
Be nice, if you’re rude or shut down/silence your opponent it will reflect on your ballot, and possibly a comment to your coach. Debate should be a space where people feel comfortable to engage and develop new ways of thinking, treat it as such.
Underview:
Traditional is good, progressive is good, run theory well, run kritiks well, and be nice. I'll drop you for being problematic!